I agree. Some games are built from the ground up as a MP only and some as SP only and I'm good with that. I don't suggest or think that all games should be made for all players. I'm just pointing out that the value of my money, as someone who detests MP, is the same as anyone else' and the only way to get it is to provide a narrative single player experience. Deliberately making a game without a single player campaign is the same as saying that my money is of no interest.
Thanks man.
They're making a film about Tetris!?! Budgeted at $80,000,000. The first in a planned trilogy. FFS.
Just more stupid clickbait bullsh*t.
-Thief
-Ryse
-Crysis 3
-The Division
-The Order: 1886 (Again!? seriously f*ck off about this game already)
All games that were just fine.
Any game that wants to earn any money from me or people like me needs to have single player. Period.
No single player is a choice to forfeit a market. This recent trend of lying to that market by saying there's single player or a campaign when there really isn't is very short-sighted because it breeds distrust and gets companies boycotted. Respawn, Microsoft, Bungie blacklisted. EA, Dice, thin ice.
@ Twiggy
Wtf is wrong with you!?
It had some flaws, most games do, but I really enjoyed The Order. Obviously a lot of other people did too. Your opinion of the game is a minority opinion. Try to come to terms with it.
Smart article.
Broke? No. Maybe a little cracked though.
@ SonyStyled
I paid even more to import from Japan to Canada. No regrets. I'd buy a remaster for it in a heartbeat too.
So... only remaster games subject to YOUR approval?
Tired of them? Then how about you stop playing them then. Start playing some new games instead. There are so many of them, I can't even keep up. Problem solved.
You know what I'm tired of? People bitching about remasters, remakes and reboots. I love 'em all. Keep 'em coming.
Yet another announcement for an announcement and once again, nothing revealed. Waste of time.
If a reviewer can enjoy a game to it's fullest, then they should be able to review it, regardless of their skill.
Too many gamers (esp. pc elitists) believe that if you can't "git gud", you don't deserve to even enjoy some games.
If you've paid for your game (unlike many of those same pc elitists), then you should be able to enjoy the full experience of the game, exclusive of the whys and hows of any other players, period.
A well ...
Makarov is definitely the most charismatic. His methods may sometimes be abhorrent but his words aren't always wrong...
The author invalidates his own article in the second sentence "I haven’t really bought a AAA game in a long time"
He shouldn't be commenting on and passing judgement upon what he HASN'T experienced. At least he's aware that his definition of fun in a game isn't necessarily any or everyone else', unlike so many game "journalists".
I despise QTE's in a game -cheapest so-called game mechanic out there, but several of my all-...
Good luck with that. /s
I just couldn't justify buying them a fourth time. Especially when there's no real improvements over previous iterations.
I thoroughly enjoyed the first Homefront -there just wasn't enough of it. I quite often end up enjoying a lot of games that are generally panned. You just have to appreciate each game on it's own merits, without comparing it to the last few games you've played. I'll definitely be picking this one up myself when the price becomes more reasonable here in Canada.
Not going there. That headline is the very definition of "clickbait"
Couldn't care less anymore. This guy has been getting far too much press lately. So you got replaced. Big deal, move on ffs.