He was talking about the PS3. ^_^
Actually, I simply responded to your words (if they were off topic, that isn't on me). I'm just saying that, while I agree with the notion that gamers should try to be as bipartisan as possible, that needs to happen from the messenger as well.
Not a big deal.
"You PlayStation gamers"
Funnily enough, that actually goes back to the hypocrisy that I am talking about (also funny considering I game on PC and couldn't care less about allegiances).
Regardless, if your message is that gamers should be more open to each others' differences, keep that as your platform. But, when you say stuff like the nonsense above, it makes your point null, because you do not truly believe it.
Just...
You don't have to trash Sony's games to reach my point. You haven't always been so easy to deal with and this is a welcome change from you.
I'd just like to see more of this from you if you seek it from others. Don't speak as if other gamers are an issue if you, yourself, can be part of the problem. That's all.
"All three do great things"
"Only if same level of sportsmanship was shared by gamers "
Remember this in the future. Your comments haven't always been so bipartisan.
OT: PlayStation giving credit where due..... again. Without Nintendo, and PlayStation, gaming would not be where it is today. They paved the way for competitors like Xbox and continue to be industry leaders to this day!
Saying and doing are very different things. No need for the ‘concern’.
Forget? I don't think he can name everybody, but Sakaguchi is surely someone to note!
Well said, SuperSonic. Sony has really well and truly helped pioneer this concept. Nintendo opened the door, Sony joined. They are the corporations to thank! :)
Sony is the last company I'm worried about either releasing big/small games or ANY at all. ^_^
Because that isn't exactly what he said:
"And with our decision to do fewer games -- bigger games -- over longer periods of time, we got to a point where June of 2019 was not a time for us to have a new thing to say. And we feel like if we ring the bell and people show up here in force, people have expectation "Oh, they're going to tell us something."
He'd rather not give us a false sense of hope when he knows games are either f...
Based on nothing but the same SonyToo™ stuff that many of you preached when Sony flat out denied ever planning to do the same things Microsoft did during their Xbox One reveal.
OT: As other, more sensible, people have said, thank the Lord! Not that I want to see Fortnite die, per se, I just don't want every shooter to become Fortnite. So, I'm with Layden on this idea.
Basically. :P
As usual with silly questions like this, the answer is no.
So you go and attack Uncharted because you're having trouble conveying a message? No matter how much you try and deny it (and claim to be totally unbiased and/or some kind of Sony fan) you always end up proving otherwise with comments like these. Don't cry foul or claim to be a victim of the 'downplay' when you are one of those very people.
OT: I'm sure they'll keep things going just fine.
Thank you.
@TK-55: Why hold back the visuals for the sake of the console version? Simple. Money. They make more money on the lower-end console versions. Why push the PC as hard as possible with those things in mind? The return won't be the same. I get the sentiment you're after, I'd also prefer harder pushed effects/visuals etc..., but that's just not reality anymore.
So, you ultimately answered your own question when you mentioned Crysis and Metro 2033 (though 2033 re...
I explained them. Neither game was held back by console hardware. Every game has sacrifices, of course, but PC exclusives have less.
It has absolutely nothing to do with 'fear' and each case is different. For starters, involving consoles means they have to dial back on many things (notice very few in-house games from each console manufacturer saw any "downgrades"). Crysis and Metro were pushed as hard as they were because they were very few sacrifices that needed to be made.
For Crackdown, the biggest issue was that it promised too much (and too early).
@rainslacker: I didn't say they were owned by Microsoft. I said they are a Microsoft website (meaning backed/supported).
For most, it isn't necessary. But, as you will learn in this age of "I have a right to speak errrr..... complain on social media", the very select few make enough noise that it still finds its way into news articles.
Bottom line, Sony sold nearly 100 million PS4's in under 6 years. Without BC! Clearly, most don't care that much.