I hope it's DLC. I don't want to have to buy a whole new game that is basically the same but slightly expanded.
I don't believe so, but monthly seems logical.
I think it's decently priced (especially considering what I was afraid it would be), but I wish they offered a 1 year subscription that was cheaper per month. I also wish they allowed you to use PS Now to play games you have already purchased without a subscription.
That's what I figured, but I couldn't resist.
Me neither. Love everywhere I go.
"my status as a highly respected video game journalist" - AlcoholicLuigi
No offense, but as someone who has never heard of you before this came off as humorously ironic.
They are giving a $50 voucher to everyone who bought one in the first three or so months. I would hardly say they are "getting away with this." Quite frankly, I'm just thankful to be getting anything, especially considering I was unaware of the lawsuit before today.
@Dee Odds are good the ad was made by an a advertising company, not Sony.
Also, while I would like to agree with you, I don't buy that they just pulled it because they didn't want to listen to people whine. I mean, wouldn't a bunch of controversy actually make the ad more effective? In my opinion, I really can't see them removing it as anything but conforming to feminist wants. Whether Sony agrees with these feminists really, doesn't matter; what matters ...
In today's society it appears that men finding women attractive or women acting sexy is "misogynistic," despite the opposite obviously being true. I'm disappointed to see Sony conforming to the wants of these feminist lunatics who are more concerned with making everyone exactly the same than actually addressing some of the real problems that exist in our world.
I think we are just going to have to agree to disagree. While is is disappointing that Sony doesn't make more first party games for the Vita, that shouldn't take away from the plethora of third party game available, or from the quality of the few Vita games that Sony has made.
In my opinion, these titles are enough to make the Vita's line just as diverse as the 3DS library, especially when one considers all of the indie titles available. Granted, the 3DS may have...
While I agree that the 3DS is not all hype, I also don't think it is a clear as you make it out to be that the 3DS has a better lineup. When it comes down to it, which system has better games is completely a matter of opinion. For example, one of my favorite types of games sandbox building games like Minecraft and Terraria. In the case of this genre, I think the Vita clearly beats the 3DS. Similarly, I think the 3DS has a much better selection of turn-based RPGs. It really just depends on...
Although not all titles are available, the Vita does have backwards compatibility in the form of download PSP and PS1 games. TBH, making the Vita backwards compatible with the PSP's physical media would have probably done more harm than good as it would require adding a disk reader to the system. That being said, Nintendo should be applauded for keeping the 3DS's physical media similar enough to that of the DS that physical backwards compatibility is possible.
In my opinion the Vita slightly edges out the 3DS, mainly because the hardware is better. I personally have a really hard time choosing which one has a better library.
How would one go about getting Walmart to price match this? Print off the internet page and bring it in?
Let's be real: the Wii U doesn't even have the best exclusives among the current Nintendo systems.
It's not a deal-breaker, but I think it's a pretty big deal. Before X and Y, people had been wanting to customize trainers for years. Adding the feature in for just one game seems like an unwise decision. It's especially strange considering that ORAS is built on the same engine as XY, so very little would have to be done to include the feature. In my opinion, it shows that Gamefreak cares more about constantly changing the series than actually evolving it (no pun intended).
The lack of Muppet voices alone is a total deal-breaker.
J.R.R Tolkien? Possibly. Christopher Tolkien? Hell no.
If they allow you to stream games PS3 games that you have already purchased on PSN, I will be all over this. Until than, I seriously doubt I will get much, if any, use out of the service.
True, but if people choose to sell their current 3DS to get money towards a New 3DS (which I'm sure many will), they will probably have to sell their charger along with it.