i remember the launch of the ps2, and the godawful games that were available, if you look back, i thought ps3 had a strong launch. better than msofts, if you take away all the xbx/xb360 cross platform stuff like nfs and gun and king kong
take movies for example. . . we'll say, blue velvet, which is an engrossing experience with deep characters, and an excellent performance by dennis hopper, and malibu's most wanted, which is the crappiest movie i've ever sat through in the theater. if you were to release these side by side, which do you think would sell more tickets? and you'd all be like "jaime kennedy ftw!"
i guess gears was "unique", as in the first game to "uniquely" steal kill.switch's gameplay. hell, even the grenade button was mapped the same. and i can't say it had a unique story, b/c it barely had one!
the graphics are awesome, definately above and beyond anything thats been done on wii yet, but you really can't compare to 360/ps3 cuz even the lowliest, ugliest 360 game runs at almost twice the resolution.
unless you live in japan, with super duper internet connections
but i was kinda dissapointed, with the rechargeable health and whatnot. definately prefer sigma, although i guess since it was the third freakin release of the game, i cant expect ng2 to be as polished
yeah, it wouldve been much better if they had replaced the stormtroopers with aliens, gave you a battle rifle, put it in first person, shorten the story line to 4 hours, get rid of all that pesky "euphoria" crap, and put the apprentice in battle armor. Now THAT would've been original!
i think i read somewhere that the wii's processor runs at, like, 744 mhz or some crap (please correct me if i'm wrong), and that the original xbox could do lighting stuff that the wii cant. if thats true, ninty needs to step up! i remember when i bought a cube just for RE4, and the graphics were sick. i'd like to feel that way about another nintendo console
like upgraded skills, lightsaber crystals, outfits, etc. it should be quite nice with all the rpg lite stuff
all msofts games are better on pc
i'm all for halo launching on new xbox, but if we get another paltry 6 hour campaign, with the same multiplayer tacked on, i'll be pi$$ed.
they committed to ten year plan (like ps2) they never said they wouldn't release new console, just that they'd support ps3 for ten years, like how ps2 is in its ninth year, and games are still coming
i'm guessing that the ps version and 360 version are coded differently, so in theory, the patch you download on xbl is diff size, diff code, etc
yeah the actual gameplay of KZ2 is insane. its a good thing its 720p, cuz 1080 would burn your retinas out!
its like killzone. some say the target render is better, some prefer gameplay, but in the end, heavy rain's graphics are spectacular. i don't think we'll be getting shortchanged when it comes out
and what is this "original" concept of crackdown that theyre improving upon? last time i checked, there was like 4 million open world games
dude, its good for gaming b/c you can dole out diff jobs to each processor, but you don't have to use all those calculations for games.
yeah, b/c sony wouldnt know anything about games, not from experience with psone, ps2, psp
any lcd can get dead pixels. it goes with the territory. its not like sony programs them in
mine isn't loud either. my elite sounds like a freaking jet engine, whereas my 60 gig sounds like a jet made by ninja