Probably not, but I don't really care. And he's clearly not an idiot.
It was a sex trafficking rink that presumably involved a lot of rich folk. Epstein was charged with it and supposedly offed himself in his cell, many believe he was murdered to conceal clients.
I said I I think it's his eyes, as you probably already know people with downs typically have certain facial features like slanted eyes and flat noseses. If you're offended, truthfully I don't really care.
Just an observation of how he physically looks, i think it's the eyes.
Guy looks like he has a touch of downs.
And TF3.
@lodo
Start reading the whole conversation and not just 1 comment, so you can follow the conversation better. The point I'm trying to make is that Sony and others weren't forced to charge for online, How is MS to blame for others charging for online, like the guy I replied to suggested? Sony and Nintendo made that decision themselves.
And where did I claim Sony was the first to charge $70 for games?
BS. Ms didn't force Sony and others into charging for online or any of the stuff you mentioned, it was a joint effort. All these companies want to try and squeeze customers for maximum profits. Just like Sony pushing for $70 games, I suppose MS made them do that too?
I'm not sure who's developing this and I may be missing something here, but it looks like Pubg with mods. It looks so much like Pubg that I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out to be built from it.
You've stated that you own a PSVR, I find it funny that you think you're too grown for Nintendo games but not too grown to put a headset on and swing your arms fighting imaginary NPC's. Lol
Hold on, let me get out the tiny violin.
🎻🎶😢
You have people who are whining about MS stopping games from being developed for other systems, it's completely relevant to bring up Sony doing the same, you just don't want to hear it.
@Redemption
The claim was made by the FTC. It doesn't matter if the hearing took place is Europe, that does not make them European regulators.
Anyhow seems you want your cake and eat it too. It's fine when regulators used the semantics to paint a picture of a smaller market in favour of Sony and then you turn around and get upset when someone uses the same semantics against them.
So people are wearing Robin around their face as Batman sits on a shelf and watches 😳
It wouldn't die off, it just wouldn't be quite as popular. It seems like a dumb move to remove it, but that's now looking like what MS plans to do in 10 years.
Nah they should keep it as long as they can, it's more revenue in their pocket to put towards their development and it gives them more time to develop a game or 2 to compete. Maybe they could convince Bungie to develop a COD clone for them.
@Redemption
Says: "You guys are not very smart"
Yet doesn't know that the FTC are not "European regulators"
OK?
Overreactions bring in the clicks.
Cool story, tell it to someone who gives a rats?