Where are you people pulling this "stipulation" from? I've never seen anything that states that there was a stipulation that minecraft had to stay multiplaform. The narrative makes no sense as Microsoft has released multiple Minecraft spin offs on the other consoles afterwards. They've also released multiple other games on the Switch, they're obviously not opposed to having some of their games on other consoles, youre spinning a false narrative.
I really doubt that. There was just no way that they were going to see a return on the amount of money they gave for it without keeping it multiplaform. Same with COD, they just stand to make too much more by keeping it non exclusive.
Disagree, I'll take a well prepared video that gets straight to the point over top of watching awkward pr guys coming on stage and overly use their hands when they talk.
By adding battle passes with op guns locked behind it. I just don't like the idea of having battle passes in paid games and they nickeled and dimed people enough by forcing people to buy Infinite Warfare with Mw1 when it came out.
Idk Nintendo has been adding online play to their games included with Nintendo Online and Xbox is adding this game to Rare Replay, non of those older games had added online play.
Wow. And if someone complains about a $70 remaster, its because they want it for free? Have some dignity man and dont blindly support every decision this company makes, you doing that is only showing them that they can squeeze more money out of you.
Where are you people pulling this "stipulation" from? I've never seen anything that states that there was a stipulation that minecraft had to stay multiplaform. The narrative makes no sense as Microsoft has released multiple Minecraft spin offs on the other consoles afterwards. They've also released multiple other games on the Switch, they're obviously not opposed to having some of their games on other consoles, youre spinning a false narrative.