CRank: 5Score: 59000

Trebius, I can't think of any decent reason why you would get that worked up over the Xbox 360 other than you are an insecure virgin geek with no friends.

5937d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

Man of the Year - To say "Droids get so scared knowing that their beloved PS3 is in 3rd place never to see the daylight of 2nd or 1st EVER again.",would imply that the PS3 was once in 2nd or 1st. But hey, the PS3 may eventually catch up, but it won't own the market like the PS2 did. And if the PS4 doesn't have some sort of media format advantage over the next Xbox like the PS3 has with Blu Ray, then there is a decent chance that it will fare even worse.

5937d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yes, DC Universe online is a rare exception. It's on the PS3/PC, but I'm not a computer gamer, so it might as well be a PS3 exclusive to me.

5938d ago 4 agree2 disagreeView comment

It'll probably always be that way with MS consoles and the PC. If MS can secure an exclusive for its brand, many times it will probably want the title on both the Xbox and Games for Windows. It's definitely something to consider if you're an avid PC gamer. Even so, there are still great titles like Halo 3, ODST, Gears of War 2, Fable 2, PGR 4, etc. that have not made it to the Games for Windows platform.

For many people, they like to game exclusively on the console so they don...

5938d ago 7 agree1 disagreeView comment

Actually Maiku, there was a hint of sarcasm there. I don't think Sony is any more money hungry than the next company. But even your idiotic self knows that if it were MS raising prices on something, they would be crucified, but since it's Sony, it's ok. By the way, how do I only "think inside the box", or is that just a pun for being an Xbox user?

5939d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

How can a company be that money hungry? Oh yeah, because they're a company. At least PSN is still free though, gotta give them that. For the time being, anyway...

5940d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

So the PS Eye and Natal are the same thing? So where are all of the controller-less games for the Eye Toy? Surely Sony wouldn't be that dumb not to capitalize on their own product, right? And if Natal was the exact same thing, MS wouldn't release it with so much hype, knowing that their main competitor already has the exact same thing, right?

The PS Eye is similar, but not as advanced. Even if it were exactly the same thing, it's not MS's fault that Sony hasn't really taken a...

5940d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

"It's a common condition amongst PS3 Supporters that doesn't allow you to view the competitor's games honestly"...you've got a good point there. People fail to realize that being able to acknowledge the strengths and weaknesses of both makes your opinion more respected.

5942d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Transfreak, I am fully aware that it is still free, and I hope it continues to be that way. I would like to get a PS3 somewhere down the road, and it would be nice to not have to pay for another account.

What I'm saying is, the fact that the Sony exec. didn't deny that PSN will be going to a pay format similar to Live is not promising. If it were going to remain free, I think he would've flat out denied it to clear any rumors right then and there. I think one of two things wil...

5942d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

"Kaz Hirai stated that Sony is looking for ways to expand the service, hinting that there might be a paid subscription of PSN similar to Xbox Live." -- The Sony spokesperson being interviewed just went on to talk about the growth of PSN...he never denied it becoming a pay service in some sort of way.

I was hoping PSN would catch up to Live and force Live to become free for all...an example of how competition benefits everyone. The sad truth is though that both services...

5943d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

@r0s3b0wl23 - Sorry, but hype and advertising will only carry a series so far. If Halo was lackluster, it wouldn't sell as much as it does, it wouldn't create as much online traffic as it does, and the games wouldn't get as high of scores as they do, period.

LOL at Chubear. Sorry, but words of people on a gaming website won't determine if a console gets killed off. No one tried to "kill off" the PS3. It's a freakin gaming console for crying out loud. Did it get mad...

5945d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The graphics in the trailer looked amazing. However, just like any game on any system, the only graphics that truly matter are the actual gameplay graphics, which we have yet to see.

5945d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

No crap Live is the better service. When everybody says it's the better service except for PS3 fangirls in denial, it should tell you something.

5947d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Sales must mean something, because people keep going on and on about them, on both sides.

However, you're right, sales don't determine how good a game is. But GOW 3 won't necessarily be better than Reach because you say it will be. Reach will most likely be the best FPS of next year, and GOW 3 will most likely be the best third person action game of next year. Two different genres, and two very good games.

5947d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Saaking it says in your bio that you play the 360 and PS3 about evenly. So why the 360 hate? You hate the "bots"? Do you honestly think the 360 fans are worse on this board than the PS3 fans?

Also, it's not just shooters that sell more on the 360. It's pretty much anything without "soccer" in the title.

5947d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I've noticed people saying things like "the PS3 Slim" failed, or "the 360 failed worldwide", stupid stuff like that. First of all, it sounds incredibly dorky when people say things like that. The only time it doesn't is when something truly fails. The 360 and the PS3 have both made their mark this gen. Sure they had little failures here and there, such as the 360's attempt to penetrate the Jap market and the PS3's attempt to keep the PS2's market share. But overall, th...

5947d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

They could charge a boatload for loading screen ads, as the article suggests. However, if MS were to try this "experiment" with a game, it wouldn't be a Halo game, that's for sure. They'd try it on a game that's not expected to sell as much first.

5950d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

True. People are very quick to cry "homophobe" and "racist" these days. Those cards are always played, and it gets old. To you Democrats out there, do you think it helps Obama to accuse people who don't approve of his policy as being racist? Think again. If a person who has an honest criticism of the gay lifestyle is called homophobic, that doesn't help matters any either.

5950d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

They're only disappointments in your feeble little mind, fanboy. If you couldn't tell by sales, reviews and the online traffic generated by those games, they were all major successes and are very popular. Are there any 360 games, you do like? For anyone that can't say anything good about the "other" console, their opinion is irrelevant because it's completely biased.

5950d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

"Because YOU english SUCKS"

You put the MORON in oxymoron.

5950d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment