But the thing is, not everyone prefers that lineup of games. I like the games offered on the 360 much better. There are a lot of great exclusives that the 360 offers that the PS3 does not. And vice versa...people just have there preferences, and if you like PS3's upcoming lineup better, than by all means get a PS3. I'll stick with the 360.
Also, a lot of people, dare I say the solid majority, have had great experiences with the 360. It's a great system. It works great for mys...
What does he do, wash them with soap and water? I will never believe a number that high. At least they gave him a new Xbox, to Microsoft's credit.
I'd go through 11 Xboxes too before I went to the competition, simply because of the game lineup. Bladestar, I think that is the reason that people are willing to go through a few systems (if it's true) - the superior game library. You won't be playing Mass Effect and Bioshock on other consoles.
How is the 2006 game of the year, Oblivion for an AAA title, Billy boy? That one came out in March, four months after launch. Call of Duty 2 is pretty good too, although the coolest launch title in my opinion was Condemned, but I don't think it was a big enough hit to be called AAA.
Hate to tell you "Bill Gates", but both Sony and Nintendo have a LONG way to go before they can rival the Xbox Live service. I'm not saying that they won't get there, because quality will come with time, but it's not going to happen over night.
"Bill Gate5" with a 5, you rule.
You'd have to be retarded to believe that. I mean come on. They won't get back 2500 in a year.
What sounds more homo-erotic? "Would you like to play with my Wii?" or "Here, grab onto my Waggle Wand"?
I think this is kind of gimmicky. The 360 can do just about anything the PS3 can do except play BluRay. It can even play HD-DVD if you buy the add-on, but the key is that you don't have to. Yes, more things may be able to happen on the screen at once if they take full advantage of the cell.
The games have looked roughly the same on both systems so far, many times with the edge going to the 360. The same goes with how smoothly the games run. It will be the same way throughout this ent...
I think that maybe releasing the beta and giving people a taste of what Halo 3 will be like took away some curiosity over the Halo 3 live experience, however you have to remember that it wasn't the finished product. They're actually using scientific data collected during the beta to improve upon it. Not to mention there's the whole campaign mode that continues the storyline to look forward to.
Halo 3 will definitely be the biggest game to be released in 2007. Notice I didn't...
I think that all 3 systems this gen. will have a more equal percentage of the market share. Of the 3, the Wii is the sprinter, the 360 is at a more moderate pace, and the PS3 is the long distance runner. I think the Wii will lose its novelty after awhile, and that Nintendo will be the first to introduce their next system, which will be high def. Maybe they could call it Wii HD. Who would want to put their hands on a Wii in HD? Well, besides people who find that style of game play to be gimmi...
I thought the GameCube was a great system. If I never bought a GC, I would've never had the chance to play one of my favorite games ever, Resident Evil 4. I was so happy to see the RE5 is coming to the 360.
Since the events surrounding the story line are often freaky and strange, I think they should call the game Q.U.E.E.R. - you know, in the literal sense.
Seriously though, no matter what they call this game, the graphics look a lot better than the first one. I'm curious to see in-game play though.
What the hell kind've video was that? This game better not be a disappointment.
I don't think that Microsoft is sub-par though. I think they deliver a gaming experience that is superior than what Sony can deliver. People who got a faulty 360 may disagree, and understandably so. However I believe that most people who got a 360 will tell you that the game lineup, the controller, and Live experience simply cannot be beaten at this time by any other gaming company.
I think it looks a little better on the 360, judging by these two screens.
The gameplay is really fun. It's a shame that this game doesn't have a single player campaign mode. That really hurt it, in my opinion.
I never said that yours didn't have a problem, I just said that the majority don't. It is well documented that there were a lot of problems with the early 360's. I had an early 360, and I would get "disc read error" a lot. They put in a new disc drive free of charge, and now it works perfectly, as do most that weren't made at the end of 2005/beginning of 2006. All of my friends who bought their 360's are very happy with them. The early 360's have a higher than usual failure rate,...
Totally.
People will continue to flame the other console until the next gen. comes out and then it'll start all over again.
Yes, the 360 has had its reliability problems for SOME people (for some reason, my friends and I are not in this category. Must be luck, yeah that's it.) However, it's an awesome system. They are becoming more and more reliable, and the faulty systems are becoming less and less. What will Sony fans bash the 360 on when the problems are fixed? Certainly not its ga...
I wish they would make lives too. Maybe they could sell you one, because if you hate people that much based on a console preference, you obviously don't have one.
Most people's 360's work fine, as does mine. My 360 is $400 well spent. I play it almost everyday, and great game after great game is put out for the system.
I couldn't justify buying a PS3 because a) 360 has more games and better games. b) Why pay $600 when I don't care about BluRay? c) Why get a system that's going to have barely any games worth playing until TWO YEARS after the next gen. began?
Or maybe it's a huge game that's poised to be an AAA title, and they want it to be perfect for release. One of the things that developers love most about the 360 is that it is very similar to a PC and easy to develop for.