The title is so clickbait. They even made sure to put No Man's Sky in brackets to get people's attention, just in case someone doesn't know who HG are.
He's not lying. In Nomura's original version all characters were supposed to be playable. Then again, Nomura wanted to change this into a musical.
Not necessarily a bad thing. It offers more time and chances for proper character development. I'd rather have 4 defined characters with a guest character coming into the party occasionally than a pool of unnecessary characters (e.g. Chrono Cross where it seemed like anyone and everyone could join your team).
3 of the 4 are key elements to any game...
RE 4 was just as survival horror as the previous titles. Maybe it's run and gun on easy mode, play it on hard mode and you won't have enough ammo to run and gun.
Weak article from Dualshockers. Did they even watch the whole stream?
Since it's in French it would have been nice to know what that one cutscene and the game crash was about.
There is a confuse status, could be seen in one of the gameplay vids. As far as I understood it, it messes up your directional controls.
@s45
Yeah, and on the PC you can't play FFXV.
When i got the game i lived in a rural area with no proper internet connection, so all the news about vaan being pushed into the game last minute flew past me. With that in mind, i loved the game. Imo the story is much more mature and believable than previous entries. You could see some.proper character development in almost all main characters, and a story that honestly can be confounding is viewed through the eyes of a young boy, which makes understanding it much easier.
...
This was apparently written by an executive editor...
It reads as if it was written by an elementary school child.
Interestingly, in psychology that falls under the category of cognitive dissonance. It's the need of human brain to create a consistency in action and result.
Say Arthur buys a game for 60$ and Mike buys the same game for 30 $. The game is objectively crap. People of the Mike category will more likely accept the fact that they lost money on the crap game, while the brains of people from the Arthur category will make them think that the game is actually good and ignore a...
@4sh0w
That statement might just apply to the marketing, as Sony only financially supported them when it came to marketing. Sony also offered to help HG fund the development but HG refused that offer. So in my book, HG takes credit for how the game ended up, Sony takes credit for marketing it like they would an AAA game even though they probably knew what the game looked like.
While I like Nomura's character design, as a director he's...I dunno.
I mean he wanted to make versus 13 into a musical after watching Les Miserables. Thankfully other developers like Tabata voted him down on that one.
Final Fantasy XV has depth too. Imo Tabata made a mistake by trying to make the game appear easy. You can choose to play the 'hold button to attack - hold button to dodge way' but that's on you, not the game. Besides the combos you get that way there are moves and combo breaks you can perform by combining the dodge and attack button with directional input (at least in the Duscae and Platinum demo there were). Also the option that dodging right before the attack doesn't consume...
Sincerely, dgukmgl, there is a big difference between Final Fantasy XV failed to impress at EGX, and Final Fantasy XV failed to impress me at EGX. I opened the article because I read about rather positive responses to the game at the event. Especially when browsing the news on my phone I don't check whether something is an opinion piece, news or whatever, I go by the title. Your title is in fact misleading, presumably with the goal to get more clicks.
How is that any worse than clicking through menus to do the same?
Also there's warping, dodging, changing weapons to combo and change pace, link attacks, special attacks, enemy weak points, magic etc. But yeah, it's button mashing...oh no wait, it's button holding...or what was it now?
Clickbait and misleading title.
I swear 'I got what I expected' is the worst argument ever. If you got what you expected you obviously didn't follow the game's development.
I'm a huge sci-fi fan so in any sci-fi game the physics are what attract me the most. I'm not mad that most planets are bare and empty, that's how space is. But one of the things he promoted the shit out was the game's accuracy in physics, like that the distance to the sun affects the planets' envir...
Yeah, a work in progress for 60$.
Why does everyone here have a problem with mobile so much?