It clearly wasn't worth it with everything it offered.... how could it be worth it just for VC?
Do these writers have any brains?
I don't play PvP, but what the hell is this guy talking about? Does he not realize how many people play it?
The article may not be trash but the designer's point is pretty stupid. He's right that most TVs don't support more than 60fps, but these consoles are barely able to hit 60.... so don't blame TVs.
The game is over a year old now, so I don't see it as a big deal.
Phil Spencer lied? Tell me something new.
That's the same article I posted man. The first Best Buy response didn't know the order specifics as he explained. Later in the thread they admit there was an issue. They've been refunding everyone for months.
HEY BRAH, LEARN TO READ.
It doesn't say that 44% of Sales in the USA were on PS4. That is worldwide. You can't just assume it is the same in the USA, which we know has a heavier Microsoft presence.
I'm sorry you guys can't understand statistics.
Breakdown By Platform
PlayStation 4 – 44% (up from 31% in Q1 2016-17)
Xbox One – 22% (down 1%)
PC – 21% (down 5%)
Others (mobile, ...
And the secret core!!
Don't spread your false information. Ubisoft did not reveal any console specific numbers for any regions.
If you actually read the forum post solution (which is 3 months old at this point) that was directly linked in the article.... you'll see that there was an error that affected a very small amount of people and it had been corrected and they were sending out automatic refunds.
http://forums.bestbuy.com/t...
The author here is basically a moron and he assumes that since something isn't in the beta, it won't be in the final game. The loot and light system will all be in the game, Bungie has already said so.
They accidentally revealed their next exclusive, My Little Pony True 4K
It is very likely that Ubisoft sells more in NA on PS4 than the X1 because we all know Sony has won almost all NPD months.
But my point still stands. Based on these charts, you can make no conclusion on PS4 vs X1 in North America (let alone that they are dominating them). So, "Wow! That chart really shows that Sony have taken dominance in North America." makes no sense.
Do we NEED any game? No, we don't.
Do we want games? Yes.
Do we want TLOU2? Yes.
Chevalier that is worldwide, but doesn't prove they are dominating North America.
The 360 is one of the best selling consoles ever... so not unusual that X1 isn't keeping pace.
@LordJamar, you're right, but Pachter was specifically talking about market penetration and he is right that the X won't help in that regard because of the cost.
He didn't say anything about Pro. He said it is expensive compare to the S and Slim. You could buy both of those for the price of the X.
And yes, $500 is expensive for a console for the average casual gamer.
Just looking for clarification, but how did you come to the conclusion out of those 2 charts that Sony is dominating NA? The regional chart says nothing about platforms.
People keep talking about how the original beta had so much more to offer. No crap, it was a brand new game and they needed extensive testing to hash out bugs. Now their engine and systems have been in use for 3 years, they don't need to test all that stuff out.
You can't assume that because the beta offered little, that the game will be the same. I mean the guy who though their weren't going to be drops and leveling because he couldn't do it in the beta....