Really? to me it'd look like they don't know what gamers want and are scrambling to react when they finally figure it out.
Maybe. my biggest concern is going to be who plays geralt. That voice in the games... to me that's so distinctive, I can't imagine someone else filling it. Kinda like when they got a new Sam fisher.
That and Netflix has been hit or miss for me. I love daredevil but didn't care for Jessica jones. Loved luke cage, but couldn't get into iron fist. I laugh heartily at the ranch but can't give hemlock grove the time of day.
so 50/50 expectations for me...
Really considering alien isolation. I don't care much for first person games with a few exceptions, I'm thinking this could be one of them. Wonder if this'll come to PS+...
Really? straight to anti sjw rubbish? Just the possibility of a Netflix series and you jump straight to it huh?
Gotta admit, that one made me chuckle.
I thought they said just not a new entry in the main series. I was expecting a new spin off. I've got a feeling their next game after this one is going to be a true new IP. There's people calling all over the web for 343 to do something new. And seems everyone except Xbox's fanboys want it. but they'll come on board as soon as 343 announces it will be something new. Fanboys' opinions usually change with their preferred company's stance.
That would be so awesome.
Nice. Your move PS, ditch the move controllers as the standard and come out with something better. Add a HDR pass through capable break out box while you're at it.
One of the few first person shooters I actually got into.
Sure I'm hoping for MS bring us some good stuff at E3, but I'm also interested in the year or two after E3. I got burned after their "mic-drop" E3 showing where now the only thing left standing of any note is crackdown.
That's combined, X1 is kinda being dragged along by PS4.
Also, this might be around the time the Kinect released. If so, last gen would be getting a nice shot in the arm due to 360 sales.
A porno?
Played the original witcher with the steam controller. It was.. different. not bad, not better, but felt like something new. Which I guess that was what they set out to do
He said bigger, you said better.
Him: the sky is blue.
You: lol no, the grass is green.
"2% difference is a lot closer than how things have played out this gen. So in actual fact, a lot would change. "
Not really, this is US only. the sales are much closer when looking only at the US.
So no on the links, got it.
A shame as I wanted to see what these arguments were against net neutrality. So far I haven't heard anything other than if we trust these companies with being able to charge us more they'll somehow charge us less. If there is a real argument to be made against it, I'd like to hear it.
To your original point, you're backing companies that just want to make money off you. Those unelected bureaucrats? what do they stand to gain? ...
@outside the box It's the old "both sides do it" defense. Sure I embezzled millions from the company I work for but Johnny found a C note on the street and didn't claim it on his taxes. We're both criminals and should suffer the same penalty.
The difference is if a scientist comes to you and says "I have the cure for cancer", you're saying you don't like it because it's in pill form and you wanted an injection. Net neutrality works. the majority of Information Technology experts agree. And much like climate change, we should listen to the experts. if the topic is climate, lets listen to climate scientists, if the topic is the internet, lets listen to IT experts. When you listen to someone who stands to p...
So no on the links then?
FF15 did alright.