Now how would I go about getting my hands on it n' are they NTSC as well?
I'm not sure, but I think he was just fooling around... 'least I hope so.
I've yet to play either. But WHEN I do, I'm sure I'll walk away from the single player experiences of both games not comparing them, but revering in FUN I've had with each respectively. As stated before, I don't need to compare them, I need simply to make sure I treat myself to some of the best gaming gaming has to offer.
If I compare Bioshock to anything it will be the original Halo because it's a new IP, as was the original Halo. I can't compare new IP's to sequels. What ...
I won't get into naming the current AAA releases on the 360 to date, but if those weren't satisfactory to you and you feel as though HALO 3 is the last chance for your 360 (and from what you say the only decent game the 360 has), then maybe gaming as whole may simply not be enjoyable to you anymore.
You've gotta almost completely isolate yourself from any HALO 3 info or reviews you come across. I remember right around the launch of HALO 2, every corner I looked on the net had some new tidbits of the campaign mode (as the reviews started to pour in). I think the only one I read was from my monthly subscription of GAMEINFORMER (it was either them or EGM), because they made it very clear they weren't going to ruin or reveal one thing about campaign to it's readers.
Stay a...
They sure do know how to have some fun over there.
Funny vid.
Master Chief for President.
The 360 will fall behind because Halo 3 and Bioshock are to be released on the console? Though there are several reasons why the 360 may fall back in the console race, certainly neither of them would be due to a lack of games.
If I were fortunate enough to own stocks in Nintendo I'd sell, not because some analyst (or anyone for that matter) says so but because I think this is surely a climax for Nintendo n' I'd be unsure if they'd have another like it anytime soon.
As for the Wii losing ground...I think they will, soon. But not in any significant way at all. While this console gen is far from over, I'm almost certain Nintendo's system will at least finish 2nd. I thought the Wii was just a fad tha...
I guess it was worthy of posting since most here seem to have gotten a good laugh out of it. But me, personally.... To each his own.
The console will not ship with that controller (view image), it's available separately for a limited time and I actually like the Spartan and Brute themed controllers.
However, they should have chosen different colors for the Halo 3 themed console. That green just doesn't sit right with me.
If you base your game purchases solely on reviewers opinions and scores, without even renting, you'll miss out on a lot of fun.
I had a lot of fun with the original Stuntman, though I did have to put up with it's frustrating challenges n' flaws. N' that's what it all really boils down to; what you are or are not willing to put up with in a game.
I'm sure I'll be renting Ignition, just as I did the original.
The Yoda, 300 n' TMNT are my favorite designs. Even tho I'm no major fan of either IP's (save 300), they're still very nice designs.
See 14
I've been debating for a while. My 3 previous 360's were all premiums (2 sold n' the other stolen) but that matt black n' extra 100GB is almost too irresistible. If I'm able to find a premium in my area with the newly included HDMI port I'm jumping on it tho. That's going to prove difficult as store employee's working in game departments have the knowledge of a 80 year old bed ridden grandma. No one knows about the premium's with HDMI n' try n' convince me what I'm talking about is actual...
Sweet as hell, n' no, it's not up to movie standards. With that being said, I can perfectly understand why it isn't up to movie standards; it isn't supposed to be. It's just a short n' even those cost I don't know how much to make. The budget for the movie is already going to be massive. These are just to give us a small taste of what can n' will inevitably BE.
This was a great short.
I don't even feel like reading this article. Why do they insist on moving backwards instead of progressing?
How much should a gaming console be capable of? Well my next gen system of choice should be capable of anything just short of giving me a blow job considering the current gen's cost n' features.
I misunderstood, and I wholeheartedly agree with the above.
You's real funny, I like that. Personally, none of the LETTERS (or words for that matter) gave me any trouble, the phrases n' statements they comprised is what's got me stumped.
"Developer B: FP10-32bit / 880×720 / 32bit Z / 2xMSAA (9.9MB) rendered to look right when upscaled to 16:9 is also possible."
Quite honestly, I don't understand any of it, n' the above is a spectacular example. N' for future reference, it's not that all of us are defensiv...
I'll take the Steinway system over all the other things combined.