Controlling something with your eyebrows isn't telekinesis.
Article dated April 1st.
zzz
Maybe somebody wrote an 'Early bird' virus..
I'm not skeptical. I believe it works. But that doesn't make it desirable.
I'd rather play my games in high definition without artifacts and with zero lag.
10 fps faster? Is that it?
If I want an extra 10 frames per second then I can disable Niko's left shoe in GTA IV.
These hardware manufacturers (CPU, GPU) shouldn't release anything until it's capable of giving at least twice the performance.
will they make my computer faster?
If it relies on SLI then I'm not really interested.
Not enough developers are supporting SLI.
It's not a tease, it's just pointless. A girl can't flash a guy a booger and expect him to be excited.
For a brief moment I thought I was watching an MP3 play in Windows Media Player.
From my experience everything is laggy with bluetooth.
My russian friend said it says "Do you think the idiots will try to translate this?"
I've analyzed the trailer and I noticed that at exactly 1 minute and 18 seconds into the trailer I fell asleep. From this I've deducted that the trailer is crap.
I'm more impressed by the fact that some readers of N4G know about quantum computing.
I know I don't! :)
They can't render images out of thin air.
I think some people are assuming the images are rendered on a magical supercomputer and sent to the client machines. The OnLive server hardware will be lots of regular PCs with NVidia or ATI video cards.
NVidia and ATI will still be needed.
The industry as a whole looks troubled. Seems everybody is running out of ideas on how to make chips faster.
I've got money that I want to spend on faster video cards and CPUs, yet there isn't anything available. and I don't see anything on the horizon either.
Dark times ahead for the industry.
People are spending their hard earned cash on hi def TVs and large monitors. They're doing this because they want the best image quality possible.
OnLive is a big step back.
It might be fun to try Crysis on a netbook, but the novelty will soon pass.
This type of tech can only be useful for cell phones. The idea is that they render low res images on one of many regular PCs and stream them to a cell phone.
But to generate high res images and stream them to a desktop PC in realtime wouldn't be practical. They would need a farm of supercomputers and the end user would need a very fast connection.
Exactly! :)
The GPU is slowly turning into a CPU.
Polygons and rasterization aren't enough. Perhaps when we finalize new procedures for generating realistic images in realtime then specialized hardware (graphics cards) will become useful again.
they should've given us a lollipop at the end. :(
i want my lollipop! waaaah!!
I like it!
It should fit nicely between my keyboard and monitor so I can watch movies on it while working and browsing on my monitor. I do this already with my iphone, but it's a little too small.