I know RPG doesn't mean Dungeons and Dragons.
It means skills and upgrades and customizing a character in a multitude of different ways.
Elder Scrolls is an example of an RPG. You can be anything from a bow wielding sneaky character to a full on mage to an armored beast with a sword and shield.
In Witcher, you can be Geralt. That's it. You use a two handed sword, and a crossbow and the same 5 spells as every other single pers...
One of my favorite shooters ever.
I wish they weren't wasting time on a campaign, honestly.
I don't deny its popular, but that doesn't make it good.
It's one of the worst RPG's I've ever played.
Just my opinion. It was a 5/10 at best.
Witcher 3 doesn't deserve to be on this list.
It's not even an RPG. All the skills are samey and change little or nothing, and there is almost zero character progression of any sort.
It is not a good enough game to make any list. I will never understand the love for that mediocre game.
Probably because there haven't been any good ones.
I came here to just say the same thing about Assassin's Creed.
I thought UBI came out a while ago and said they were skipping a new AC this year.
There are always going to be people like that.
I just try to fill in the gaps as best as I can. As long as you don't get stuck with 3+ stubborn people you should be ok, because you're likely playing against equally disorganized groups on the other team.
The real solution is to have your own group, of course, but that is easier said than done sometimes, obviously.
I get the impression that when you are in a group the matchmaki...
I found that line hilariously terrible, but I loved that they have a sense of humor about it and later added the exotic version of her gun and named it "No time to explain".
Funny. :)
Over rated and Over hyped to you, maybe.
I thought Witcher 3 was over rated. I think Overwatch is one of the best games I've played in years.
Opinions differ, and they are all ok. We are all "allowed" to like and dislike whatever we want.
I'm glad I don't live in the internet-less world that all these people must live in that makes "always online" such a terrible thing.
If Xbox had gone ahead and done it's original "always online 24 hour check in" plan without telling anyone at all, I still wouldn't have encountered it to know that it existed. And I'm betting the same could be said by most of the people still complaining about how terrible that would have been to be f...
Witcher 3 comes close to endless content?
Are you insane?
That game may have been big but it was terribly repetitive. The combat never changed, so unless you're counting every fight against identical enemies as "new content" just because you're in a swamp instead of a forest, then you're a crazy person.
I think it makes sense to wait a couple weeks and see what they announce at E3.
Best multiplayer I've played in recent memory.
Same here. I never played a class based team shooter that I liked but I let my buddy talk me into this one and I can't stop playing it.
Love it!
A Kickstarter for a niche title, a remake of a 20 year old game, and a former PS3 game that still looks like a PS3 game graphically, and it's gameplay looked awful.
I'm really, really still trying to figure out why anyone thought their E3 was good last year. It was terrible.
Horizon looked great, and they had a neat demo of UC4. The rest was garbage.
I don't get the anger at Blizzard over having microtransactions in the game. It is all 100% cosmetic stuff that doesn't affect the gameplay in any way at all.
They are selling a product, and some people want to buy it. Where is the problem?
I don't like McDonald's hamburgers, but if I go there to get some chicken nuggets I'm not going to be pissed at them for selling something I don't want.
I just don't get...
There in lies the problem. Most people nowadays can't think for themselves. They have to be told what to think.
Of course Blizzard paid websites to spam stuff about the Overwatch Beta.
That's how advertising works.
For the record I still think VR is terrible regardless of what system you plug it into.
You keep saying the "punishment should fit the crime" and comparing it to chopping off hands for stealing an apple.
Most people think this punishment fits the crime perfectly, myself included. It's a way to stop them from doing what they are doing. How else do you guarantee they don't cheat again besides just locking them out?
We aren't asking for these people to be executed or imprisoned. They cheat in the confines of this game, ...