C'mon, I love my X and Pro as much as the next guy, but calling them "lazy" for not supporting it is uncalled for.
You have no idea what kind of work goes into a game like this, and what kind of work goes into making it better on the 4k consoles.
Don't just call people lazy because you didn't get what you wanted, it's rude.
I'd have a pretty easy time making a review sound positive being as how it's one of the most fun games I've ever played.
Good point, the only opinions that are valid are the ones that you agree with.
I mean, of course there is a zero percent chance that out of the 3 votes cast so far, any of them could be from somebody like the people on this site that haven't played it and never will, but go there just to give it a .1 or something.
That clearly could never happen.
It’s boring after ten hours?
So I guess a game like the Order should have gotten like what, a 2? Because it’s over in half that time?
Indie games that are 2 hours long should get like a .4, I guess?
Paid advertising that also says a bunch of negative things about the product?
That seems like a crappy form of advertising to me.
This should hopefully make the forts better.
As it was, it was sort of pointless to even try to take a fort if there was another ship there. You'd fight with them and never progress the fort, one of you would die and be back a couple minutes later to do it all over again.
It would drag the fort out so long that it made more sense to just leave it and go do something else.
Exactly.
Taking a side in anything political is a quick way to cut your potential customers in half.
I don't think you understand what GAAS means.
It has absolutely nothing to do with Game Pass or PS Now.
Who cares how many people worked on a game or how big the budget was?
When you are playing God of War and you're thinking to yourself "This game is awesome, I think I like it more than Horizon: Zero Dawn", are you going to stop to do some research and determine which one had a bigger team and budget, so you can do some calculations and then decide which one is a better game?
Or are you just going to play it and enjoy it and not think about a...
lol not even close.
Yeah I've put about 100 into it as well.
Still nowhere near to reaching pirate legend, sadly. :(
I agree totally. It has quickly become one of my favorite games of all time.
Yes, the game is fantastic fun, but it seems most people would rather complain about what it ISN'T, than enjoy what it IS.
I don't get it.
How are you defining "content" when you say No Mans Sky had more content than Sea of Thieves?
World size and animals? They were all procedurally generated and very similar to each other.
Number of quests? Fix your ship, fly to center of galaxy.
What am I missing here? How are you guys defining "content"? I've see others say NMS had more, but I've played it, and I liked the game just fine, but there was no...
I'm so sick of hearing the word "content" thrown around. It's such a generic word that could mean anything in this context.
I've put probably close to 100 hours into Sea of Thieves and my friends and I are still playing it every second we can. There is no shortage of things to do and fun to be had. Every voyage is different because of the unpredictability of everything that can happen along the way. If this game was played solo, with no other playe...
Well I'm only one guy but TLOU's gameplay was not cup of tea.
I thought the story was superbly presented but I would not have finished the game otherwise. I only suffered through playing that game to see how it ended. So yeah, TLOU2 can suck it, unless they drastically change it, which I wouldn't expect them to.
Not if they were paying attention they didn't think there would be "tons more content".
Rare laid out basically everything in the game ahead of time.
I knew exactly what I was getting, and I'm beyond happy with it. It's the most fun game I've played in years.
You know, it's possible that somebody just isn't interested in this game, right?
I mean, I have a PS4 and I've played every single God of War game and I'm not really interested.
I'll wait and see and maybe try it down the road somewhere. From what I've seen I don't care for the changes they have made.
It has nothing to do with "salt" or whatever other millennial slang you want to use.
They aren't talking about stopping pvp.
Attacking other players is part of the game.
It's actually really good, but it doesn't have the longevity of the first game.
So if you are the type to just play for 100 hours or so you'll probably think it's great.