QUOTE from Article
"Listen Sony fans you had your time, since 1995 you had the best console, best games and community."
Funny thing is, the PS3 has the better games and community is debatable (depending where most your friends are)
Give it around 8 months and the PS3 will not only still have better games, but also more sales, so how is that not 'defeating' the 360?
And yet the PS3 managed to outsell the 360 WW during the holidays, despite Kinect. So much for Kinect making the 360 unstoppable...
LOL @ this article
Does the author realise that the PS3 still managed to outsell the 360 WW during the holidays, despite Kinect and the amount of $$$ Microsoft put behind it's marketing?
Does this controller have the same dead zone as the 360, or is it more like the DS3 analog sticks?
This would be great, even though the DS3 is still comfortable
PC gaming is not 'dead', but damn its lacking in games.
Not many PC games to play, Starcraft 2, The upcoming Witcher 2, and Diablo 3 most likely won't be coming this year.
Compare to all the games coming out on PS3/360...
It really does suck to be honest.
The good old days have definitely gone for PC gaming.
Still doesnsn't stop me from upgrading though, which is a bit silly consider...
Really interested in the tension adjustable analog sticks. One, of not the only flaw (besidesthe dpad), with the 360 controller is the stiffer analog sticks compared to the DS3.
Problem with this is you don't get enough precision aiming. This tension adjustable solves that, so really looking forward to trying it out.
Would be nice if Razor made one for PS3
DevilDog
Yes that is correct, both hands are symmetrical. BUT, it's 1 thing being symmetrical and it's another not having the sticks in the 'natural' location.
DS3 has a symmetrical design, but the sticks aren't in the NATURAL location.
If you want BOTH symmetrical and NATURAL, then both sticks would need to be at the top.
At least with this design (Raven), the left analog stick is in the natural position.
...
True, but I wouldn't cut it by that much.
I do believe, even though the 360 is 3m a head, the PS3 does have a larger ACTIVE userbase then 360, due to RROD.
miDnIghtEr20C - Thats because there are no Nintendo fanboys. How can soccer mums and 4yos be fanboys?
Dark_Charizard
With all the Kinect hype and Microsoft marketing behind it, yet the 360 still can't break away.
When PS3 launched, gap was what 8m?
Now it's 3m
Talk about being outsold by PS3.
TheDivine - ME2 now on PS3.
Alan Wake was GREAT
Conviction - shit
Reach - shit
Metro - shit
fable 3 - shit
PS3 had:
GOW3 - great
Heavy Rain - great
GT5 - great
So PS3 has 3 great games compared to 1
Therefore PS3 WINS
OTHERZINC, it's pretty much official. It's not that difficult to see the PS3 has the better lineup.
Sales does not equal quality either
COD is proof of that.
Nice to see the ergonomic layout of the 360 controller, but will become useless if the analog sticks are too stiff and has a larger deadzone like the 360 controller (poor for aiming)
If this has the same loose feel as the DS3's analogs and same deadzone, I am all for it.
"The Raven also has a switch that swaps the L1/R1 and L2/R2 bumper/triggers."
BRILLIANT!!!!
I currently use the 360 controller on my PS3 and usin...
Graphios are some what important, but no where near as important as gameplay.
I remember playing Crysis on my PC on MAX settings. The game looked gorgeous, but after I got over how nice it looked (about 30 minutes), I got bored with the gameplay.
Ive played graphically inferior games like Just Cause 2 and had much more fun with that.
- A game with amazing graphics, but crap gameplay, will still suck in the end.
- A game with ...
WOW Treyarch stooping to new lows.
Yes no games are bug free. But theres a difference between bugs being in games, because they were not identified at the time of development and release, compared to, being lazy and knowing full well about all these bugs during development, but releasing the game anyway.
Please don't use the "All games have bugs" excuse for your laziness.
There really should be a law in place, for delibera...
The BIGGEST Failure is the lack of exclusives.
The fact you have to pay to go online with 360, they should at least have dedicated servers, instead of useless features.
PSN is free and has more dedicated servers for it's games, then XBL does.
I think this award is only for 360 lineup. It's the only way to explain it, as I can mention LOTS of games that had better graphics then Halo Reach in 2010.
Unless of course Microsoft threw $$ at these guys, which wouldn't surprise me. Halo Reach did got , what? 10/10 on IGN. Microsoft obviously threw $$ at IGN, hence the high rating.
GENOZSTRIKER
You do realise you make the 360's graphical lineup sound awful by saying what you just said right?
Halo Reach has average graphics and if you say 'visually it's one of the best looking 360 games for 2010', it just proves how far behind, graphically, 360 games are, compared to PS3.
EASILY Mass Effect
Halo - just another generic, average FPS, with god awful storyline
Mass Effect - awesome story, large universe that you can explore. Living, breathing world with different alien races. Addictive combat system.
No contest really.
KOTOR FTW though!