Not surprised by this at all, considering most 360 exclusive games are sub-HD anyway.
Alan Wake
Halo 3
Splinter Cell
I could go on..
“One of the drawbacks with playing first-person shooters is the lack of speed and accuracy offered by traditional controllers”
That is only true if you ahve no skill in aiming.
Mouse & KB - Good for people who have no skill in aiming. Instead require assistance from a high precision device (mouse). No thanks. No satisfaction that way.
The biggest thing 360 needs is GAMES.
As we all know 1 of the main things that shows off how great or bad a gaming system is, is the number of QUALITY exclusives on that system.
THe 360 is extremely lacking in the QUALITY EXCLUSIVES department, only having around 3 quality exclusives (Gears 2, Halo, Alan Wake) Fable 3 went multiplatform (PC) so thats off the list, as well as ME of course.
Only 3 games! Very disappointing.
<...
"Though i would like a list of the "more devs" he is talking about."
Because they can't name many, hence why they just say "more devs' :D since most of PS3 devs are first party
Sony have nothing to worry about. Most of Sony's game developers are OWNED by Sony, who make great games. Microsoft are the ones that need to worry. They hardly have any games that are first party. The majority of their exclusives are made by a 3rd party developer, who can easily shift and start making games for PS3 as well.
It's Microsoft that need to worry, not Sony.
"I bet most of you 360 fanatics have not even seen the PS3 version of Red Dead Redemption. All you can do is believe these bogus screenshot comparisons, and tell yourselves the 360 version is better."
Denial yet again. Thanks for proving my point.
First of all, I don't trust these comparison sites at all, as they can easily be manipulated. I compare both versions ON MY OWN TV. I do the comparisons. That way I know for a fact which is true.
...
I find it funny that theres already 1 person disagreeing with a FACT. It just proves my point.
D E N I A L
hahaha :D
Both you ps3 and 360 fanboys are as bad as each other. But the PS3 fanboys seem to be worse of the two. They say that the 360 fanboys are in denial, yet it's the PS3 fanboys who are in denial as well. Why? Heres why
Red Dead Redemtpion
PS3 version
- sub-HD
- more jaggies
- inferior lighting
- less polygon count
- blurry (which causes objects being less refined and ahve less depth)
YET, Ps...
Fable 3 and Halo Reach are not stellar. If by stellar you mean 'QUALITY'.
GEARS 3 on the other hand will be stellar, no doubt about that. Also remember Fable 3 is not 360 exclusive, it is confirmed for PC platform as well.
THere is nothing 'stellar' about 360s exclusive lineup, except for a couple of games (Alan Wake, Gears 2 & 3), unless Gears 3 goes to PC as well.
360s exclusive lineup lacks a decent amount of qual...
Article makes no sense what so ever.
Our hands have not changed, so why should the PS3 controller?
Everyones hands are symmetrical, so moving the left analog stick an inch or so higher and a bit to the left is actually bad ergonomics, considering our hands are symmetrical. So the analog sticks are perfectly placed.
Though, there are 3 areas I think the PS3 controller can improve.
1) Make the handles (those bottom thin...
There are a few people here, giving inaccurate information, such as "Alan Wake as amazing graphics" "One of the best games ever"
This is simply not true and I wish people would get their facts straight before posting.
For the time it took to make Alan Wake, graphically, the game is a little bit of a disappointment. Yes, it does look great (in some areas), but it absolutely pales in comparison to games like Uncharted 2.
The PS3 passed the 360 in Europe (total sales) around 8 months ago...
This news is old.
Obviously you haven't played games like Uncharted 2. Go play and see for yourself. It really makes every 360 game look dated.
Why sadly?
You prefer the blurry look? Yuck, it makes the game look awful. The textures are all blurry etc...
no thanks
Are these screen shots switched?
The bottom shots (360 version apparently) looks awful. The textures are less detailed, lack of detailed shadows, washed out look.
Usually this is something you'd see on a PS3 port.
Seriously, spend it where it is need. The 360s exclusive lineup. Because its weak at the moment.
The 360 quality exclusive lineup is incredibly tiny, with only around what 3 quality exclusives this year (2010) :
Alan Wake
Halo Reach
Crackdown 2.
Only 3 quality exclusives this year. NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
Spend the $$ where its needed Microsoft and thats the exclusive game
Is this the best Microsoft could do? Monster Hunter? seriously?! An average game that isn't even exclusive. (It's on PC if I am not mistaken)
The 360 is DEAD in Japan. That is a fact and now Microsoft pay off a developer to get this game only on the 360 in Japan instead of PS3?
Talk about DESPERATION.
For that reason alone, God of War 3 will NOT surpass Uncharted 2 graphically. Use some common sense people. When a developer decides to set a game to run at 60fps, graphically detail will need to be sacrificed.
Uncharted 2 is currently the most graphical looking game on the PS3, I don't see anything surpassing it anytime soon. Perhaps Crysis 2? Rage? I don't know. Time will tell.
GOW 3 will be running at 60fps and uUcharted 2 runs to 30fps.
For that reason alone, Gow 3 will not surpass Uncharted 2's graphics. It is just not possible. When you choose to run a game at 60fps, you are forced to make graphical sacrifices.
I doubt it will even surpass Killzone 2's visuals.
This is really a silly article. 60fps vs 30fps, not going to happen.
"You are right, it is awful that MS has gotten away with charging people to play games online, especially when they dont even provide dedicated servers for the games they publish like Sony does - For FREE"
You can't blame Microsoft for this. They are just taking advantage of stupid consumers.
They KNOW there are consumers out there that have a low enough intellect to pay for something that should be free.
Don't blame ...