ufo8mycat

Member
CRank: 5Score: 87250

Same thing occurred for The Witcher 3. These games are, an exception, to everything else. That is what also makes them so special

900d ago 2 agree15 disagreeView comment

Reviews should be OBJECTIVE not just SUBJECTIVE

906d ago 5 agree3 disagreeView comment

Ouch!

Though, keep in mind, this is the same reviewer that gave Prey 5/10, apparently. So probably not a trustworthy reviewer from someone who has no idea what a great game is.

906d ago 8 agree40 disagreeView comment

How games like this should be played. Never was a fan of having my hand held in games. Much prefer actually experiencing everything myself in a game, rather then have someone else do some of the stuff, therefore I won't get to experience that aspect since my co-op partner is doing it for me.

932d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The lack of talent from the devs is the problem. Funny how games like Horizon Forbidden West runs at 60fps and that game also looks better.

984d ago 7 agree0 disagreeView comment

Creative decision?
I guess thats why the PC version is 60+fps.

Wow

986d ago 35 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yeah, lets win back the fans by releasing a game that only runs at 30fps. Great job Microsoft!

987d ago 17 agree1 disagreeView comment

The difference in talent between developers in this industry is baffling. 30fps? For a game that doesn’t even look that good? If only this was on PS5 and developed by a talented dev team.

987d ago 20 agree2 disagreeView comment

They said that Rogue was buffed, but reading the article, all I see is that Twisting Blades has a longer cooldown now, critical chance for some attacks has been reduced, though I guess damage done by Caltrops has been increased...

Haven't started the game yet, but I plan on playing a melee Rogue.

995d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

F*ck off with your empty apology. You knew the game was garbage yet you released it anyway and now you are attempting damage control.
Developers like these need to be blacklisted from the game development industry and never be allowed to work in it again.

1003d ago 8 agree0 disagreeView comment

Nintendo have no right to complain about this. Dont like this Nintendo? Then release hardware that is capable of making your games look decent with 60fps and dont charge full price for a game that is technically not up to standard to AAA games from 2023.

Simple

1013d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Congratulations on ruining the game and experience for yourselves.

1018d ago 9 agree9 disagreeView comment

"It is no different than going to a store and stealing"

There is one MASSIVE difference. You are 99.9% likely to get caught when stealing from a store, unlike online

1019d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

That would explain their lack of effort with their titles. They have already waved the 'white flag'

1025d ago 22 agree1 disagreeView comment

This is what happens with GamePass
GamePass - Less budget and look what we got
Arkane Studios - Developer that brought us games like Dishonored and Prey. Compare those games to this...

This has Microsoft & GamePass written all over it on why the quality is garbage.
Should have everyone worried about StarField.

1026d ago 12 agree0 disagreeView comment

PC - $0
People already own a PC who choose to play it on there.
Btw, the Switch IS the broken version. 30fps with outdated graphics. Go look at Breath of the Wild on PC, then look/play it on Switch and tell me which is broken.

1027d ago 12 agree4 disagreeView comment

Don’t get me wrong, the game is great, BUT they are still charging full price for a game that is outdated graphically by more then 6 years (switch was outdated on release), runs at 30fps.

Piracy has its place. If a publisher is going to overcharge for a product.

PC version for me. 60 fps as well. If it was 60 fps on Switch with todays standards, I would gladly support Nintendo and buy it full price

1027d ago 6 agree7 disagreeView comment

So you support outdated games from a technical level, where the game is 30 fps on the Switch and is more of a expansion then a new game, all that for FULL price? This is exactly why Nintendo gets away with stuff like this

.

1027d ago 14 agree10 disagreeView comment

Lets put it this way, if this was a Sony 1st Party Studio who made the game, there wouldn’t be any performance issues.

1030d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Not sure what the problem is?
Capacity : 667GB
Jedi Survivor: 150GB

TIP: Stop keeping games installed on the PS5 that you are not currently playing. There is no point.
Plug in external hard drive -> transfer games not currently playing. Problem solved.
It’s not rocket science

1033d ago 31 agree10 disagreeView comment