Bayonetta 2 won't be considered a flop after the other two systems get their release of it. You know it's going to happen. Don't be naive.
Lightning Returns probably won't do so hot either. Final Fantasy doesn't have that same following or anticipation it once had. There's still people that want Final Fantasy but many of those people don't seem to want these Final Fantasy games.
Gears of War Judgement doesn't seem to have that ...
The only real things that bugged me about GTA IV's multiplayer is no way to split screen & the lack of support it got. For a first official approach to GTA multiplayer though it is quite fun. I still play from time to time. Been trying so long to get my platinum for GTA IV but missing level 10 overall(I'm at 9 with around $2.9 million out of the $5 million needed to hit 10), beating the times on Bomb-Da-Base & such, then winning a match in every multiplayer game type.
...
Until you realize that in the same bill it also made it illegal for me to buy M rated games for my kids in the future. Shouldn't I as a parent have the right to decide what my kids play since I know my kids better than the government?
Expect a flurry of Mario to continue over the next few years with a 5% chance of hardcore games not being direct ports from older consoles or the inevitable next gen systems around the corner
So what's really trying to be pointed out as factual is this:
Nintendo games look cartoon-ish compared to 360 & PS3. But why wouldn't they? Even their advertisements show what Nintendo really wants: A low aged userbase that's willing to cling to the newest little trend that'll die in about a year, at which point Nintendo will attempt to shove it down their throats a little more.
Not to mention the amount of support they put into LBP. I think that's the best part of the game and something more companies should look to reproduce in the future.
I mean really. They're still releasing new DLC & fixes for an over two year old title plus expanding the functionality of the game at the same time with things like the PS Move & Cross Controller packs. Then to add to that at least making MOST of the DLC cross usable between other LBP branded titl...
The return of some old stuff that disappeared through time would be nice though.
Custom Championships
GM Mode
Working for the stats of your CAW(Can't stand they let everybody max their stats in the end just with creation)
More access to backstage areas & ringside
Less limitation of movesets when fighting backstage
Weapon finisher selection(Could choose what finisher you wanted with chairs in Smackdown! Here Comes The Pain. Only ...
Rockstar making a WWE game would be amazing
Enough said
@rocky047586: http://n4g.com/news/1143791...
Probably not very happy with THQ...
Considering every other console demonstrated a gain in sales including the older Wii it's easy to see the only system really in trouble and in this case, it's not the Vita.
If that's not enough there are literally 0 games for the WiiU taking over the sales charts. The supposed "inferior" PS3 & 360 versions are up there though.
Maybe because it's another experience being added to a game that's already out? New levels, new ways to play, new items to obtain, and new ways to create.
You won't need to buy the pack to use your Vita with LBP 2, just pay to play the Vita Cross-Controller specific levels which nets you those rewards and tools to build Cross-Controller experiences in your own levels.
But if that's not enough, they're supporting an almost two year old titl...
Can't wait to get the Cross-Controller pack. $4.99 for new levels, rewards, & create options plus new ways to play is a great deal. Plus all you need is a PS3, copy of LBP 2, & a Vita to take full advantage of the pack.
The Move pack was very well done so I have high expectations for this pack as well.
LBP Vita isn't needed for Cross-Controller support. All you need is a copy of LBP 2, a PS3, & a Vita to take full advantage of it.
Don't know why people are bothering with this unless they're really already that bored with WWE '13.
Besides. '14 will be like '13 which is like '12. We do know that too since THQ has said numerous times they've been working on '14 and '15 since even before '13 went gold. '13 was already being done before '12 even went gold.
You want to suggest things for new WWE games? Start suggesting for '16 and hope THQ ...
@PopRocks359: And again I state, Sega fans said the same thing back in the day
I'm sure Atari felt much the same way.
You can't argue that Nintendo will always be successful because they were in the past.
Banks can go bankrupt. Governments can go bankrupt. Nintendo isn't an exception just because it's Nintendo.
Sega fans said the same thing back in the day. We all know how that went.
Not to mention that they're government agencies buying in bulk for a purpose, a purpose outside of gaming. It's not like they're going to retail stores and buying them.
Retail units have one firmware.
Demo units in stores have a different firmware.
Do you think government clusters don't have their own firmware?
I think that moreover comes from the options that HCTP had compared to newer titles.
Being able to freely move around to different backstage areas was the greatest part of HCTP in my opinion. You weren't just restricted to set locations & dynamics backstage were much better than they are now.
Fighting in Times Square always made my day better. Was fun to climb up high above the street and fight it out. F5'ing someone from up there and sending them...
Ugh. As soon as the author had to mention the whole Attitude Mode multiple times as a saving factor for WWE '13 being number 2 they lost all credibility in my opinion.
WWE '13 is one of the worst wrestling titles I've seen in some time. Even the original SvR was more polished and well rounded than '13 and that game was just terrible after coming from a generation of games such as Smackdown! HCTP, Wrestlemania 2000, and others from previous years.
The first. They basically wanted sales of M rated games to be handled like cigarettes & alcohol. As is you have to be 17 to purchase a M rated title. Buying M rated games for minors isn't prosecuted.
The bill looked to change that, prosecuting sales people(which is one thing, don't mind them enforcing already existing policies) that sell to minors but also individuals purchasing the M rated titles for minors, IE parents in many instances. Thus why the bill was str...