... inb4 everyone else?
Or should I say after?
http://answers.yahoo.com/qu...
That's just one example. My step father is doing the same when he gets a PS3 Slim this Christmas.
Option A: Use a free disc required for only 1 year
Option B: Use a $50 a year subscription to access an intergrated feature.
lol, seriously?
"I have all these PS2 games, and no BC for PS3 at the moment! I think I'll buy the console with no chance of ever getting it."
I guess I can understand in 07 or (in some cases) 08. It was $400-$500 back then, after all.
A legend is falling. Nice knowin ya, buddy. You gave a helluva lot of memories.
Considering it went Nintendo first, then PlayStation THEN Xbox, it's really not a megaton.
If Nintendo can survive getting shut down by the PlayStation brand TWICE, and Microsoft can survive after the terrible original console, why can't Sony do the same? They're the only ones who haven't been dumb enough to cheat the customer by releasing a new console so soon.
The PS3 will compete with the next generation. It's how it's always been. By the time those come out, the PS3 will already have a large fanbase, larger than the new ones. Developers feel more comfortable will o...
I thought he was supposed to bash on the console he works with? Ah, I think he messed up! /s
I'm just sayin, why waste your time developing extras for a game your fans considered a disappointment when you could be developing a good game with that time?
3rd (or more) time's a charm!
This might sound crazy, but.... I think...... both are fun....
OMG SHIELD TEH EYEZZ!
2006:
"PS3 has potential, PS3's best games aren't out yet"
2009:
"$50 a year XBL is worth it (for 1 feature?), XBL has Facebook and Twitter coming"
I've noticed both sides switched places over the course of 3 years. What I mean by this is defending a price that wasn't valid. $600 was too pricey back then, but fanboys still considered it a good price by comparing it to standalone products.
Now, 360 fanboys try...
No, he just rather play a good game, and not GTA III with better graphics.
Oh, and for referance, Gears of War 2 has close to 10 hours of gameplay. Metal Gear Solid 4 has 20 hours without cutscenes.
Way to take a post about an hour-long cutscene and spin it so people think the gameplay is short...
PS: There's a "skip" option. It's not there for giggles.
Please don't waste your time on more GTA IV DLC. Just work on GTA V already.
Maybe it won't end up as disappointing as GTA IV. Stripping the fun out of it for more realism and making us pay for extra afterwards?! That's not the Rockstar spirit!
Pack the next GTA game as if it was a San Andreas 2, R*, for the love of CJ!!!
L.A. Noire was never the PS3 exclusive. It was suspected to be it when the media found out about it, but Sony nor Rockstar ever announced it.
Great! I keep telling people:
Before Metal Gear Online, COD4, Halo 3, Left 4 Dead, Uncharted 2, Resistance 2 and Killzone 2, there was Warhawk! Still the best online experience I ever had. I gotta admit, it was really tough to rank up, though
Few Weeks Ago:
"Uncharted 2, just 300,000? Flop"
Today:
"Forza 3, 180,000? Wait, it isn't Halo, it's not FPS and racing doesn't sell well! Waaaaiiitt!!"
It's no FPS, obviously, but neither was Uncharted 2, and as for Gran Turismo 5... well, look at the Japan GT PSP sales. It's a racing game that sells like no other.
EDIT: whoa, sorry MLG. That comment definitely wasn't directed towards you. Musta hit reply b...
I noticed a post somewhere else about a one guy posting "what does teh xb0x have next?!" and some other guy went "Zune Marketplace, last.fm so suckz itt!1!!" (not exact words, of course) =p
Any xbox fanboy who thinks about saying this, please don't. It makes it sound like you're just going down the list of things PS3 fanboys still don't have, which, in turn, sounds desperate.
Nice try, whoever started the rumor.
We have a word for rumors that get delayed. It's called a "false rumor", meaning you're wrong...
Still, I believe it'll come,just not "delayed".