Or get Insurgency or Day of Infamy, which are much better games.
Some sources from where I'm assuming the above:
https://developer.valvesoft...
https://developer.valvesoft...
Colours are a feature that HDR has, lighting is also another feature. Anyways it still remains a marketing gimmick, because it has been present on PCs since 2008 practic...
I'm not sure about the exact details (I'm not a technical expert), but HDR also includes the various colours. The diverse colours are just a feature of HDR, the main aspect of HDR is the lighting effects which include all the above things I mentioned.
HDR is just a marketing gimmic. I read somewhere that Ambient Occlusion, Bloom, God Rays and Vignetting are basically what HDR contains. I don't understand what the companies are trying with HDR on PC when it already existed since the time of Half Life 2 on Source Engine 2.
...... And huge refunds.
This is the generation of remasters.
There is a reason Rockstar released GTA V in it's current state on the console. While I'll not be surprised if GTA (Next) will be better looking, I seriously doubt that, it'll look as good as this. Probably next gen, definitely not this one. Uncharted 4 is the peak of this gen's capability which has yet to reach the benchmark set by Crysis 3 in terms of graphical fidelity.
Nah...... He is a proper critic, unlike many other biased sites. He was just like he is right now.
@Littil_Devil
I am open to better sites or people, who say the cold hard truth instead of publishing console biased shit.
I liked Destructoid when Jim Sterling was there. The only people I rely on to give me proper opinions are Jim Sterling and Ben Yahtzee.
Hahahahaahahahahaha......... Keep living in delusions kid.
They are PC centric developers. I don't think they will strike a deal with M$. -_-
True, but still better than the IPs rotting for years and years to come.
@ShadowWolf
Hahahahahahahaha........ You are awesome. Keep living in your delusions.
So you named one game, wow. And it is not even CPU intensive, it's GPU intensive. It's pretty much like Saints Row 4, a non-superhero superhero game, it isn't much CPU intensive. The AI and the level of interaction with world in Witcher 3 make it a far more complicated game.
Everybody knows that CDPR can't increase much in terms of either graphical fidelity as well as framerate. The CPU of PS4 Pro is just not upto the mark. And as for the power of PS4 Pro, it's not very different from the PS4, so what was your evaluation exactly?
Good joke. He has been cracking jokes upon jokes since the PS4 Pro reveal. What is there to know about in PS4 Pro? You need to know anything apart from plug and play? How much will he mislead the crowd.
Horizon, TBH, feels a lot like they made a FarCry Primal(In third person) meets Witcher 3 meets Assassin's Creed (With moving towers instead). I don't feel that any of the upcoming games have innovation, just mish mash of ideas.
And you have to pay 60$ for it if you owned it previously, and we get it for free.... Hmm....... I don't see a point in crying especially because PC gamers are not the ones who want remasters.
Yup. I run it on my little brother's 4 year old AMD 7770, at 900p on all high settings. But anyways who cares about a game that was shit compared to it's predecessors.
Being a PC gamer, I would say that Nintendo is not a company that makes games for sheep, they make unique games that are meant to be for intellectual beings or beings who want some innovation in terms of gameplay, not graphics. If I were to be given a chance between the 3 consoles, I would still prefer Nintendo, because I have the PC for all the generic games and the more risky gameplay innovation or ideas and I will have Nintendo which gives me creativity and polish in new ideas.