Congrats to RFOM for the great score.
"Forty players, though, may be a little bit of overkill. It's nearly impossible to coordinate teams of many more than a dozen. The map design for these big matches also gets a little overzealous, spreading out too much. Even with the full 40 people present, it's possible in a couple of maps to wind up wandering around without seeing a soul. With the promise of downloadable content, though, you don't have to worry too much about getting bored with multiplayer."
And I t...
But that's the problem. In recent articles here, it was stated how the PS3 is 3X more powerful and how much better the PS3 GPU is, but the best RR7 could do was "if you have the 360,then it won't make you go gaga". With all that power, RR7 should look MUCH better than RR6. As it stands, its an argument of which one is better and that's the problem. PS3 has yet to prove its superior.
And that's my point also. Sony has said "3X" more powerful and all Sony fans stating how much more powerful the GPU and yet the titles do not show that! The only thing it has on the 360 is that it has a blu-ray, which still doesn't show why its needed. The PS3 has been in development for quiet sometime and also delayed, which means that their main titles had more time developement time, but yet look no better than 360 titles.
If PS3's Cell is 3X more powerful and the GPU is also more powerful than the 360s, then why isn't it showing in the games? Surely a machine that is 3X more powerful can compensate for lazy developers.
GOW vs RFOM.. GOW looks better.. Don't say RFOM is a launch title so less development time. Insomniac has close ties with Sony and has been working on this title for a while. RFOM was shown at E3 2005.
RR6 vs RR7. Its a toss up between which looks better, but that's...
Well at least you play both sides :)
What I don't get is all the fuss about KZ. From what I remember, KZ pretty much sucked.. not just my opinion, but from gaming publications. Where as Halo and GOW are proven games. Why defend a crappy game?
I think the only reason Xbox fans rant is because I believe Sony called 360 more like a 1.5 and pretty much same stuff form Sony fans. All they've said is how great the PS3 machine will be.. no matter what "lies"...
You definately have to be the biggest Sony Fanboy there is. You have your own club too?
I think it was talked about was because it gave the illusion that this is what PS3 gaming is going to look like. So if GOW is compared to an great CGI trailer, then that's a good thing.
"Guys...don't argue GOW EVER AGAIN!!! The game came out...and guess what? It was completely over-hyped. People still love Halo more! It has beautiful character models, but everything else is NO WHERE CLOSE to a game like Resistance."
This is what's upsetting about Sony fans. GOW is proven to be good by several sources.. not fanboys. 99% of the Sony fans have yet to touch RFOM and its already better. Same with Killzone.. CGI and its awesome. No matter what Sony spits o...
Good titles, but most are available for 360. Sony needs more "WOW" titles to get people to pick it over the 360.
GOW has better 1st impressions that RFOM and all the other titles look pretty much the same as 360.
Doesn't mean anything.. programmers are always enhancing routines and techniques. I could push hardware to its limits because of the way I program. As I develop better graphics, AI routines, I would still be pushing the hardware to its limit but with better overall product.
Just weird that Sony really pushes about the Cell, Blu-Ray, but yet is very quiet about the RSX. I really don't care because its all about the games and as it stands they're pretty much even.
I remember when I stayed home sick playing this on my Atari 2600. Now that was "TRUE NEXTGEN"!!!!
But for 1yr additional developement time.. RR7 is pretty much RR6.5... From the links you provided, it states that use same maps, and just some updaded textures (which I think 360s look more detailed). RR7 definately does not show much improvement from 360s.
I think the top on is the PS3 and bottom on is the 360. I'm only basing it on this PS3 pic because of the large number font.
http://www.gamebrink.com/fo...
I think that's the same one as the 360 vs the PS3. If you look, they're completely different textures so I think this is 360 vs PS3.
I believe it was 1mil worldwide for Dead Rising and Lost Planet has a lot more hype.
Judging by the links posted above.. the 360 comes out on top with more detailed textures and lighting. Even if they were the same, I would be pissed as a sony fan because of the extra development time on several titles and they are inferior or just on par with 360 titles. Then add that the 360 versions have online features (TH8, Virtua Tennis, ...).
Seems to always be that way to Sony fans. When 360 has better ports (COD3, Rainbox Six, TH8..), its because of lazy devs. Yet when PS3 ports are better its because the hardware is superior.. LOL
-Fight Night 3 (PS3 release is 1yr later.. so better have some enhancements)
-NBA 2K7 (Again.. released later and should have some enhancements)
-Virtua Tennis (Higher res and takes advantage of 1080p which 360 didn't have.. I'll give you that)
No matter what is posted you will shoot it down. Here's another post:
http://www.itvidya.com/play...