Are we talking about the same "target render" as Killzone at E3 2005?
The problem is that MS knew theirs wasn't 100% and said so. Sony has keeps over promising everything.
Even if Sony is having these hardware problems, the question should be how will they support it? I think MS did a good job by extending the warranties and fixing for free. Hope Sony is just as good.
But did it state that Lost Planet was in-game footage? I think that's what difference was to what Sony did.
I think the problem is that Sony fans won't accept that GOW is a better game than RFOM, no matter what every reviewer says.
I think every comment you make on all negative news is that "MS must pay you money".
"There are bound to be some bumps, but the lack of support for older/outdated technology such as non-720p displays will become less important over the next little while. A future update is supposed to take care of this issue."
That's a pretty common comment from Sony Fanboy. Its pretty bad that you're asking players to buy new HD TVs, when their current HD TV is only 2yrs old. Sony hasn't even made a comment about this problem either.
Atleast we figured out how old you are. So is this how a typical Sony Fanboy has a hissy fit.
I said on consoles, not on PCs. FPS is king on PCs. I can't understand how you say Halo is overhyped, when you just said RFOM is gonna be the "halo-killer". You just confirmed it there. BTW, you may think RFOM is a halo-killer, but now you have to say it isn't a "GOW-killer".
You're quoting one review.. GOW has averaged mid 9s and 1UP gave it a 10, where as RFOM got from 8s to mid 9s. RFOM is NOT a killer app. A killer app should receive atleast 9s, unless PS3 standards are lower, then I understand.
Bull... I've pasted before that Factor 5 started work on Lair in 2004 and not much has changed. It was a direct quote from the developer. Unless we're calling a main Sony developer liars now too...
You want to talk about less development time. I'm going to guess that launch titles for 360 had less development time than PS3 launch titles. Where PS3 kept delaying, 360 released. I've seen PS3 developers mention that they started in 2004.
If what you say is true, Sony really can't patch this. If they do a patch, it would effect gameplay (ie: framerates, timing, ...). If that's the case, then Sony really screwed the pooch here. So not only does Sony say that HD starts when they say it starts, but now also which HD.
And also so powerful that they had to lie to the fans and said Killzone, and Motorstorm E3 2005 CGI was gameplay.
With the 360, "when it was released", you knew it was nextgen compared to PS2/Xbox graphics. There was no doubt it was much more powerful than the last gen, and not a XBOX 1.5 like Sony stated. Yet Sony fans have constantly stated that the PS3 is way beyond 360. With all this "power", all PS3 could show was inferior graphics to the 360.
With all its power and efficiency... all it could produce was RFOM which was beaten by a lowly 360 game called GOW.
"Not only is the Cell processor significantly more powerful than the Xenon, it has higher effiency and fewer bottlenecks."
Even with the significant power, PS3 can't put out nice framerates (COD3, TH8). Damn.. with all that power, it should be able to emulate a 360 without framerate issues!
Yeah... not as techie as yours, ...
I've read that the 360 has an onboard scaler to handle upconverting to 1080i. Does the PS3 have such hardware? Now if the PS3 has to handle this via Cell/GPU, would this effect the overall speed to handle games since it would tax the system?
Sorry.. double post.
Insomaniac has been working on this title for a while. They are a premiere developer for Sony and are get special treatment from Sony. How long has Sony displayed RFOM?
"But the relatively plain-Jane special effects and textures just don't match up with Xbox 360 shooters such as F.E.A.R. or Call of Duty 3, let alone Gears. "
Even newer titles that have been in development in a shorter amount of time beats RFOM in graphics.
Really can't stand it when peeps say Halo is overhyped, doesn't deserve it, ...
Why do you think there's terms like "Halo Killer"? Why do you think every fps on consoles is compared to Halo? Its the damn gold standard thats why. You never hear Killzone Killer do you?
When Xbox 360 came out, Sony Fans cried that it was crappy and the PS3 would kill it because PS3 was so much more powerful. Even called it a Xbox 1.5.. On its release, 360 looked amazing compared to PS2 and Xbox. The way Sony makes out is that PS3 is a generation leap to 360. If that's so, then why do the PS3 games look crappier and/or slower than the 360 versions? That's why Xbox fans are pissed at Sony fans. You have yet to prove anything and in typical Sony fasion, just over hype everythin...