Unimpressed

strickers

Member
CRank: 5Score: 70370

Nice idiot logic there.The Move is $99 for a starter pack.
Hell in the UK online I can get Move for £31(I have PSEye),Nav for £22 so I will buy 2 Move,1 nav for £84.Kinect is £129.99 and a bit shit if you like games.Move will also cover proper games and be less risky for dev companies.

5663d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

A 300000 lead with 18 months less on the market is quite impressive though.
These sales arguements are getting pointless.We should all want all systems to sell.It's good for everyone.

5664d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Echochrome 2?
The sports games are 1:1,not waggle.
You don't seem to understand the difference between waggle and 1:1.

5665d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I've read your stuff on here and it's clear you are a balanced,non bias multi console owner.NOT a 360 fanboy at all.

5666d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

I own both.You literally have to be an idiot to buy into the Kinect system.
Games require good responses from the gamers on this forum.
Ask yourself,as a gamer,how annoyed do you get when normal controls let you down in game?Now imagine you have no feedback and you are performing basic motions and not using complex finger controls.It will be so disappointing.
Still MS know,like Apple,their fans will buy any old crap.

5666d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

No Move is not expensive.I have PSEye.I can get it for £32.

5666d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Poor.The motion to spin moves it away from the sport it is trying to recreate.
Even the lowly Wii managed to reproduce my terrible bowling technique by bowling naturally.This again fails next to other motion control.Results looked quite random too.

5667d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

I thought the point was anyone could play?
If it proves too difficult for morons then MS definitely won't be selling to their existing,hardcore fanbase.

5667d ago 12 agree2 disagreeView comment

I'll enjoy my games with good controls,my large number of games.My 360 will continue to gather dust while yours will have the joy of watching you dance.

5667d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Might be at Eurogamer show in October.I'd like to have a go on it.I'm not at all impressed so far and in tech terms I don't see it being physically possible to match Move with the tech it's using.

5668d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

I played a lot of Eyetoy.Tech may be different but input(the body)is the same.Eyetoy is pretty responsive and can do most of what Kinect can.

5668d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

people are still listing Kinect exclusive features like head tracking,Voice control,inputting pics or objects and facial tracking.Guess what?PSEye does all of these and most of them have been available awhile.

5668d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

It's so accurate that to put spin on the ball you draw your arm across your body not bowl as you would properly.
Milo is apparently not a commercial release now.That's todays news.I've seen the demo but it may be just a tech study software.

5668d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

4 player is not happening.It was a mistake by firstplay.Confirmed by CVG.
Hopefully 2 player co op still exists!Bad news.

5668d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

All that proves is you have no idea.The 360 online costs money,has more lag,more disconnects and lower player counts.360 has greater communication features but if you can just shout to your kids then what do these matter.These 360 Live fans make these claims of superiority but apart from "but,but,but cross game chat"what else has it got.
Me and my online friends have both consoles and have all cancelled Live because it has less games worth playing and costs money for nothing...

5668d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

No they are not identical online.The PS3 has less lag and higher player counts for games(usually 32 player minimum for exclusives)so if fact playing online is better on PS3.360 has better community features but worse play experience.Popular wisdom is so often not the truth.

5668d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

Both look very good but KZ3 looks a bit better.Lots going on and smooth edges.Problem with Rage visually for me is the mid-long range jaggies.The E3 version on 360 was quite rough edged in places.May turn out that PS3 version is better but from what I've seen KZ has the edge.If they turn out well I'll get both as they are both look like damn good fun.

5668d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

I thought AW looked nice and RDR PS3 shouldn't be there.It's not that much worse.I wouldn't call the game gorgeous though,there are some weak elements to it's graphics.

5668d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

KZ2 had bots and damn smart ones too.

5668d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

You know what you said about game dev on each system is totally wrong,don't you?
Those games you mentioned are developed side by side with no lead format and as for power,PS3 games look better.I don't care the difference in power on paper,I can see a real difference in practice.
Mass Effect 3 may appear on PS3,especially after a relatively weak sales showing on 360.

5669d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment