That's not true either.Sony have large libraries of software fro Move/PSEye and is easier to program for than Kinect.It can also be patched into games at any time,unlike Kinect.
That does not change the basic similarities in gameplay between PSEye and Kinect.That's common sense,you either have it or you don't,education only does so much.
To the people talking about voice control.PSEye has a 4 way array of noise cancelling mics and did it way before Kinect/Wiispeak and PS3 has voice control of Singstar and has had it for months.
someone unable to use language?
It's a rip off that blinkered idiots say "I'm happy to be robbed".Fools.
PC/PS3 offer most Live features for free and better options like massive player counts(16 or 24 player games max is pitiful),dedicated servers and less lag.Me and most of my dual console owning friends have cancelled Live ages ago.
That is the most boring trailer on earth.I actually started skipping ahead and it was only 2 min long.Dull.
Couple of things
1.One reason Kinect won't make it into many games early is the fact games must be coded from ground up to use it.games already in development would cost time/money to put Kinect in.Move can be patched in at any point during development.
2.Why do so many people think the voice control thing for Kinect is such a big deal?PSEye can do and Singstar has had it for months.
Until this tech can see fingers and small,low lag movements,it will always be limi...
You thought Milo looks pretty sweet?You are scary.
Problem is that PSN is better for playing games online.Social network it is not.It has larger player counts per game,less lag and I've had less disconnects on PSN too.Live is over rated and these articles always make claims using the same 3 things Live does better and ignore the things PSN does better,but they always try to make it sound like they've missed out other stuff because there's so much of it.Rubbish.
I don't get why people care.Cole was a 2D character,just a gruff misery guts with no real personality.The gameplay and controls were the highlights of Infamous(a very good game)not Cole.Infamous 2 looks better,more varied,faster paced and the physics look very interesting.I don't care much about Cole,even though the new one is a bit poncy.
Graphics being better,makes a game better.That's a fact.If Rage looked like Quake it would not have one single best of E3 award.
I think the other elements of power are very important too.Killzone had good animation,physics,sound fx and AI to go with it's graphics and although the improved graphics of Infamous 2 are impressive,the physics excite more.
Anyone looking for good HD feed.www.videogamer.com always have good videos(thanks Seb).
Looks superb.Another top PS3 exclusive.
Responses to articles like this prove one thing.The 360 fanboys on here would convince themselves that sand is gold,if it had MS on it.You argue Live is better,list the same non essential 3 features,ignore the way PSN games run better online,with more players and better graphics.This has actual money value.I'm not buying it yet and neither are my friends,it's optional BUT we are all considering it as reasonably heavy users.A couple of good months and it will do well.I cancelled Live b...
Good.I'd like to keep the Call of Duty lot trapped in that game and out of my Killzone/Warhawk and other multi player games.
If you don't code for Kinect from the beginning you are buggered.It can't be patched into games.Move uses same basic code as Wii,can be put into a game at any point in it's life cycle.Tiger will not be kinect enabled either.This may also be because kinect is suffering Wii syndrome.It's not capable of what they said it was.you can't scan objects in and the lag and accuracy will be a problem.MS may not want direct comparison with Move/Motion Plus as well before they've s...
Sony made gaming mainstream.I've played since my first 48k rubber keyed Speccy and things changed from hobbyist when Ps1 arrived.Sony changed the perception of the masses.People older than me bought consoles for the 1st time in my life.My boss had one.It was weird when you grew up with them being for a relative few and was a geek hobby.Sony changed things the 1st time they showed Wipeout(even thought I really dislike the game).
problem is Eyetoy can do some of that and Move will be better for the rest.Still seems inferior to me.
Have you used a Wii?Infra red is poor.At the 11 foot I sit at it often fails.The accuracy is weak.it needed an add on,just to do what Ninty said it would in the beginning and it's pretty obvious to most with eyes that Move works better.You obviously know little of tech.IR is a line of sight tech that often fails.It' like pointing a remote at a TV,if it's not exactly right it fails.You are talking nonsense.The conduit reaches 70 fps?maybe but it still looks like a PS2 game ie crap....
The Wii line up is really poor so what's your point?Are you going to list the same 3 games they showed at E3?They'll last you a year?Zelda looks god awful.Wii is the worst console I've ever owned.3DS looks good though.You're welcome.
Because some of us tired of it when PS2 did it over 6 years ago.It was a novelty that got boring real fast and will be again.I guess some of the kids in gaming now don't have much experience like some of us that grew up from Speccy days.