Major problems with Kinect no one mentions.
1.It cannot be patched into games.Games must be built from the ground up.
2.It has no haptic feedback.Hitting,pushing,shoot ing,crashing all with no rumble
3.It will impact processing power of 360
4.It's shown nothing the Eyetoy couldn't do in some form(it may be better but I'm talking PS2)
5.You can't port games from Wii/PS3.This may not sound important but it means reduced risk for publishers...
Sony "won" for me.Best games line up.Quality and quantity.3DS "won" it for some but without in Ninty was weak.Even Zelda looked terrible.Convince yourself of whatever you want but not many Wii games look anything other than crap.
WHY still does no one concede that Live has lower player counts per match.On PS3 I play 32 player in games like Warhawk and Killzone.Paid for Live barely scrapes 24.Cross game chat is more important than average 32 player and up to 256?
There are those familar with the eyetoy and those that aren't.Those of us that played a fair bit can see the similar gameplay here and are not impressed.Eyetoy gets boring fast once the novelty wears off.You may not agree with this,fair enough but neither opinion is gospel but one comes with experience.
Dedication to weak minded fools.The 360 is a shit piece of hardware with some good games but for me PS3 is a great piece of tech with better games(now).
This is such a poor article.I will say that levels make more sense than a number and that the platinum is an important feature of trophies.
I'm looking forward to the olympics where they had out points for coming 1st,2nd an d 3rd.I can see the medal with 10 points written on it now.
But it's fine when a 360 fan says "almost everyone with both" as fact?Some PS3 fans may be over zealous but 360 fans I see on here are hypocrites and some quite clearly make claims about PS3s(and games) they have never played/owned.
6 of us,all gamers in our mid to late 30s.All of us have at least 2 consoles(PS3/360 minimum or all 3 with regret for buying a Wii)and we all barely touch our 360s now and PS3 gets all our time.3 of the 6 have cancelled Live(including me).
You have to factor time on market,then in fact 360 is the slowest selling.It had 12 months in JP/US and 18 months in EU.Even with the market to itself it sold slower than PS3.Imagine if they had launched together.PS3 has the lowest total sales but you can make a good case for it's performance being better than 360s.
Quality of hardware can mean more than reliability.The Wii is so reliable because it's not cutting edge.Old tech with the problems ironed out already but seriously lacking power,versatility,media functionality.
The PS3 has the highest ratings per game of any system and 360 has an extra year on the market(18 months in EU)with higher average ratings than they should have,due to next gen wow factor.Even the first Ghost Recon got good reviews and its pants.The PS3 has the most technic...
Co op has been rumoured with this game.I think it was said 4 player would feature in separate campaign and that 2 player for the story mode would happen too.The rumour also said vehicles would feature in multiplayer.I don't know if that just means jetpacks but it didn't seem to be the implication.
I think Sony would be mad to do separate lobby especially if Move is better.How many Moves will be sold if experienced players start getting beat a lot,and then find out Move is the difference?
The E3 trailer is obviously real time and not all from cut scenes either.
I read a rumour that Tesco will only stock the starter pack(PSEye,Move,Sport Champions)and will sell it for £39.99.That's hardly expensive is it?
What a bizzare comment this could be done of the Wii thing is.
It's like saying 360 and PS3 are pointless because the games could be done on the PS2.Nonsense.
How about the 360 shouldn't exist because all it's games could be done on PS3?
The Move will have it's own games,Sony made ones too and this usually means good things for those of us that like the Playstation range.
Saying the Wii could run something similar to KZ is one of the stupidest t...
Depends on if you value those basic functions.You used the plural but brought up the same 1 feature which half of us care little for.I had Live and PSN is better for 3 reasons.
I found it more reliable,less disconnects.
I found less lag
The 32 or more player count appeals to me and I play 32 player matches where I can and no smaller.It's more enjoyable.Live has pitiful player counts.
I won't get PS plus but at least it has tangible value unlike Live who...
What do you mean PSN has no group contact in games?Most games have squad or team features will the ability to mute others.In KZ there is voice for local(people near to you in game)and squads of 4 you form who have map wide voice.Many games are like this but it's not a PSN feature,it's a game by game basis.
Cross game chat does not matter to me.It would be a nice little add on but I wouldn't pay for it.I cancelled Live and cross game chat is the only feature over PSN worth...
And EU.Play TV(turns PS3 inot freeview PVR).Apparently 2nd version in the works by Sony.I'd guess with HD freeview.
If they sold it as a shooter,it would have been fine.I feel sorry for Remedy,they picked the wrong partner.They will leave MS,like all the other good devs do.Over at Sony many devs are happy to become owned by them,why?They back games they believe in,even if sales are limited.They give creative devs freedom to make what they want,how they want to as long as the product is good.This is why people like Sony(well,one of the reasons).Ask Polyphony,Kojima,Jaffe,Thatgam ecompany,Evolution,Media Mol...
Surely,people should try the Move.Took me a long time to switch from D-pad to analog stick.I was more familiar with the pad.Took me a long time(even further back)to go from Speccy keyboard to Joystick.I'm not making the mistake again.My 5 yr old wants Move and I thought it's not for me,but after IGN(Greg Miller)and PSM3 changing their minds I'm going to give it a look.