All Channels
Popular

spicelicka

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 192060

I agree, I think this new gen is pretty critical on gameplay instead of graphics, which is a good thing. We saw many graphically amazing games get criticized like Ryse, Killzone shadow fall, Assassin's creed, and now Order. It means you can't just use flashy graphics only to impress gamers.

4135d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yea they need to go for serious and badass tone halo originally had. No need to victory sequences. Even the announcer talks too much sometimes and sounds like a surfer, "KILL ENEMY TEAM TO EARN POINTSSS" like seriously don't have to tell us this at the beginning of every slayer match.

4135d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

You're missing the point. It does atmosphere right, it does graphics really right, it does shooting right, and it's getting acknowledged for that in just about every review.

But the question is about standards, you can't just aim for a low standard in gameplay variety and meet it and expect to get a perfect score, specially since it's a huge $60 blockbuster game going up against other blockbuster games.

Uncharted 2 was linear as hell, and shoo...

4135d ago 3 agree5 disagreeView comment

So you're gonna consider the game to be good just because it's on PS and you're a PS guy? The fact that you had to throw that in there says a lot about your bias.

How about judging the game as an individual product, if it's good then it's good, if it's bad then it's bad, regardless of what system.

4135d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment

I have not come across any hate towards Bloodborne, and it's prequels have all been critically acclaimed, so there's no reason for it to get bad reviews. The Order is a new IP and it has nothing to do with free thinking, if the game isn't good then you accept that.

^And stop making it look like a conspiracy by the media. No one has a reason to give Order bad reviews other than actually playing it and finding it not good enough.

4135d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

lol first it's both lack or gameplay AND the length. It's ironic how you're disagreeing, if anyone previewed the game and said "lack of gameplay" they would be crucified because the game WASN'T OUT! Obviously they won't say lack of gameplay if they hadn't played the whole game! they did the right thing but not going there. Open your eyes seriously.

And secondly, one site saying this doesn't represent the hundred others. They're not co...

4135d ago 13 agree6 disagreeView comment

Only your insecurity is showing here, he didn't say anything to hate on the game, nor did he bring up xbox or Quantum break. He didn't say anything about trusting this review site either. All he said was that many previews had doubts about this game, and that is completely true.

Just seems like you can't accept the review scores. The graphics are amazing and the shooting is really nice, if you like the game then that's great, but the negative aspects of it ar...

4135d ago 6 agree2 disagreeView comment

I don't understand why they don't just let us little things with our gamerscore. It would be awesome if we could buy proper themes, virtual items, or small indie games with those points. You know those games that are like $1-$3, really cheap but they just look so useless you don't wanna use your credit card to buy them.

This would be a great opportunity to get people to play them, and not costly for MS to sustain, better than the survey rewards program they had. ...

4136d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment

I pre ordered Hardline, (but) after the beta I cancelled it because it just wasn't what I was expecting. I wanted (it) to feel like BF, but it just doesn't. (It) feels like a crappier version of cod with larger maps.

There. I think it's just not his day today.

4138d ago 7 agree0 disagreeView comment

You determine it for yourself.

4138d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yep, this is literally the same thing that Ryse got for having QTE's and Titanfall got for being multiplayer only. It goes both ways.

In the end, fanboys will be insecure and blame other fanboys, journalists will use click bait articles and headlines, and normal people's voices will be lost in a sea of madness.

4138d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Goddamn I wanna fight that gaint thing (war sphinx I'm assuming)!

4142d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yea seriously it's spreading like cancer, DLC should not even be made until after the game has launched. It's such a messed up business practice that we just can't get rid of now, and there's no reason for them to stop.

4142d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

I think it's just more noticable because of the deep zoom-in.

4143d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

lol I read the whole thing to find something funny, but there is nothing. Can't believe these are considered articles now days.

4144d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Ohhh I see, makes sense. So games with gold come once a month I'm assuming, not every 15 days

4145d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

That's it, and it's not even free?

4145d ago 1 agree7 disagreeView comment

Amazing game, it deserves the love

4145d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Coool, for some reason Locke's helmet in the back is almost shaped like an Elite's (Sangheli) head.

4145d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Lol same replies no proof^

Thats like saying cover system was there in contra back when there were 2d games, in many of them you could duck behind objects and take cover, so winback didn't invent shit. That being said I'm not claiming even gears invented the cover, that's the stupidest thing u can assume. But being innovative doesnt mean you have to invent something out of thin air.

The proof is all there, no other TPS was there in market quite l...

4147d ago 1 agree7 disagreeView comment