CRank: 5Score: 15080

@ neoandrew

Not sure why you'd want to use a 144hz monitor on a console that outputs only 30fps. Even at 60fps it's a waste.

SSD's on the consoles are limited to SATA II speeds. Which is about 50% of a average SDD's rated speed (SATA III). Even then.. PC's moved onto M.2 now which is miles faster again.

Just some important facts to think about

3735d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

I love how the trolls can't ever make a legitimate list of negatives.

Lol.. can't play on the sofa? Derp
Piracy? Derp

NICE B8 M8.

It's as if the myth of console peasants being daft is actually true.

3739d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

F1 2013 is the pinnacle of the series. They newer ones are arcady and watered down

3739d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

@BG11579

Not my fault if you don't know what you're talking about.
Read up a little more on tech instead of sounding like a butthurt fanboy trying to score points.

3743d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Cool. Just enjoy it

3743d ago 9 agree0 disagreeView comment

@ frostypants

Thanks for actually caring enough to want to understand instead of inciting a flame war.

Have a look at this benchmark review

http://www.gamersnexus.net/...

If you notice the 1440p vs 1080p benchmarks. Same systems.. barely any difference in the frame rates.
This is a text book exam...

3743d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Not his fault both consoles have weak as heck tablet cpu's.
It's pretty obvious the game is CPU limited.. something both consoles don't have excess of.

3744d ago 6 agree11 disagreeView comment

LOL - but but but they haven't fully tapped out the power of the PS4 yet!! /s

3744d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Did you miss the article? News flash fanboy.. Both suck balls. If you want the best experience you need to play it on a PC. Even a low end heap will get you better framerates.

3744d ago 3 agree12 disagreeView comment

I think this is the case too. Open world games calculate alot of things in the background. I'm sure this game is CPU limited and not GPU limited.

3744d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Keep your excuses. A low end $400 PC will get you double the frame rate and high AA.
Nice try about the 'no girlfriends' part.
And since you've bought it up, I bet anything I've had far more pussy than you'll ever see.. If you've even had any that is.

3744d ago 4 agree4 disagreeView comment

Yeah, just at sub 30 fps

3745d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Graphics, Frame rates, Backwards Compatible, games selection, free online, cheap games.
What's not to like about that!

3746d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Lol how cute

3748d ago 5 agree3 disagreeView comment

And even then, Arkham Knights even still plays, runs and looks far better on PC. Don't blame people for having standards.

3748d ago 7 agree3 disagreeView comment

Same argument as yours for me.. Except why would I want to subject myself to 30fps for hours on end. Hence PC is the only option for me if I value my free time.

3749d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Well said. Petty is what it is.

3749d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Haha too true. Suddenly 30fps is enough and 900p is terrible. But no one see's a big difference on PC conveniently..

Here's the thing.. It's 2015 and neither are doing 1080p @ 60fps.. Sony fanboys shouldn't be bragging, it looks so petty once you game on a decent PC.

Ohh the PS4 fanboys are an entertaining bunch.

3749d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Tell me about it. 144hz 60+ refresh is where it's at.

3750d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Great argument there.. well, you heard it first from cfc83...pack up your 4k and 144hz screens and go get a console

3750d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment