@HaveSumNuts
Zelda won GotY awards because it’s a fantastic game and impressed a lot of people. Not because of nostalgia. If it was nostalgia the majority of Zelda games would win most GotY awards, but that simply doesn’t happen.
IMO, that type of rhetoric is toxic and serves to undermine all the work the developers did to earn that award.
It's not possible for 1080p and 60 frames on every game in handheld or docked with Switch's form factor right now. PS4 and Xbox One don't even accomplish that.
Some third party games do, others don’t. Regarding Orochi...there have been around 6 or 7 Musou releases on Switch in the last year. I think it’s musou overload for that install base right now.
Why would anyone think it would hurt PS4 sales?
They never said they’d remove the saves. They just said you couldn’t keep them.
Horizon Zero Dawn hasn’t sold more than Breath of the Wild on the Switch.
Idk what God of War’s numbers are at right now, so I’m not going to make a claim on that one.
@Taz
Couldn’t you then change your systems internal clock then and keep the games indefinitely?
An infinite number of days would be you owning the games. Obviously that's not included in the price of subscription.
I really like the overhead view on the touch screen for 3DS.
I haven't played any others on this list, but Spiderman on the PS1 was an awesome game. The escape scene running away from a Carnage infested Doc Oc was intense. The screams were almost nightmare inducing as a kid.
Not sure what these comments are about. First, it's a year old game. Many of those who wanted probably purchased it when it first came out. Second, the port is going to systems that have sold substantially less. Especially in Europe (where this game sold the most).
The comparison to Playstation 4's original release is pointless. It selling less isn't any surprise.
@metal
What about them?
Again preservation doesn’t mean having a library accessible to download at your whim.
You can preserve games without having them accessible through downloading over a website though.
@OB1
Yeah, I'm not sure. I mean, it's a small thing to complain about. Not game breaking by any means. But I'd probably agree with the author that the ability to turn the hair on or off means that it wouldn't need to be cut, per se. It can probably be altered with programming.
I haven't played the game though, so I'm a bit clueless. Thinking of picking it up on the next sale. The demo was great!
He explains in the article:
"Android "hair" doesn't exist, and is instead some sort of holographic projection. Even android skin colour changes and disappears, as is shown in both Connor and Markus' storylines when they "mind meld" with NPCs, and when Kara and Alice are reduced to their factory white shell forms at the close of the game.
We literally see Kara "turn off" her skin and hair, despite the earlier scen...
@phoenixUp
My argument had nothing to do with them owning the franchise, what a red herring.
Look at my argument again. It’s specifically talking about first party vs. third party titles. Not franchise ownership.
@ShadowWolf
Your definition is completely incorrect.
A first party game is a game made by a first party studio. A first party studio is a developer who is owned by a console manufacturer and who makes games exclusively for that hardware.
Sony published Final Fantasy 7, Final Fantasy 7 is in no way a first party title. Sorry, you’re wrong.
My goodness, look at the titles you provided me. Most of them werent made by Sony’s studios. Sony bought some of the studios later on, and have IP rights for others. That includes Syphon Filter, Twisted Metal, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro the Dragon, Arc the Lad, Tomba, Legend of Legaia, and Wild Arms.
You understand what first party is, no?
@Cmv38
Most of Sony’s marquee titles were third party on the PS1. Aside from Legend of Dragoon and Gran Turismo I, honestly, couldn’t name a single other first party game on the PS1 without Googling it.
It’s not a bad thing. Sony has so much exclusive third party support that their console became the most successful console ever until it’s successor the PS2 launched.
@Darxyde
Sure, that’s a difference but I don’t see how that goes against his argument.