I don't disagree with what they are saying. I hope we find out by E3 what the business plan for these devices are. However publishers like Capcom should know by now. This tells me that Sony and MS still are finalizing.
I did like the first SFU. It was a buggy mess in some levels, probably due to the physics engine. SFU was a best selling Star Wars game. It only makes sense to make a sequel. Just fix the issues and focus on synchronizing gameplay with the storyline. Storyline was well established in the first game.
Still need to play the 2nd one. Hope this is not turning into the call of duty for ubisoft.
I like the idea of a 30-40 dollar single player experience and 10-20 dollar multiplayer experience as mentioned above. Multiplayer is download only.
Third party exclusives will die this year. Third party exclusive DLC is another story. You will see the ME franchise on PS3.
Amen brotha!! I certainly am intrigued on how all this plays out. Sony has added a ton more features than taken out. Should I pay Sony for the additional stuff?
Sorry but I strongly disagree. I think that all three companies will bring their A game. I'm very excited about 3DS. Natal is intriguing. Sony should show off the next psp already.
inadvertant or advertant placement of the word "goal" makes me suspect :)
I hope he achieves his goal because I would like to play a game where I can't make that differentiation. Intelligent NPCs are not necessarily human-like as we all know there are asinine gamers.
So Fishy .. in other words human-like AI? If they want the NPCs to behave like a human where its indistinguishable, that's human-like AI, ... isn't it?
I get what CVG is doing ... but its rather silly to call it human-like AI ... isn't that the point?
Exactly ... AI is the capacity of a computer to perform operations analogous to learning and decision making in humans (thanks dictionary). Saying Human level-AI is like saying machine level-robot.
This is stupid PR!
Just in ..
Nintendo calls Mario 'fun'
Sony calls God of War 3 'epic'
Microsoft calls web browsing on TV 'a poor experience'
If we are comparing the PS3 browser to say Mozilla on the PC, the experience is obviously better on PC. The PS3 browser is more than adequate. Is it perfect? No. Would I do my online transactions on the PS3 browser? No. Would I watch youtube videos, gametrailers, quick hits to N4G, GAF, etc ... YES!
Downplay an experience not found on the 360, pathetic! Be a respectable Product Manager! Jeez ...
like the Sonic cycle of hope. See the first screens of the game and get hyped. Once you get your first playthrough, you realize its another Spiderman game gone wrong
Charmers, can't necessarily depend on the 'double dip'. Would I now that I have the PS3 version? No. I'm sure DMC4 was a good PC port. How many people bought versus pirated?
come on THQ ... should have released at the same time as consoles! I would have picked up on PC.
From looking at the screens, not 'seeing' the progress. May be at an early stage? Hopefully some videos will be out soon.
We should not be nice to EA Sports. If they are resting on their laurels, point it out. Don't buy the game. If the game significantly improves over last years, then buy!
If the price was right, it would have made a bigger dent. The price was wrong. Simple as that.
Good platform for ideas. I will submit mine. Hopefully Sony can use some of these ideas generated by the gaming public. They should have contests for best ideas implemented!
Its unfortunate that Sony is having supply contraints at this time. The timing of this supply constaint is rather odd and questionable. Whether you agree with me or not, FFXIII is a big release. This coupled with GOW3 makes the situation even more suspect. Make the consoles for people to buy Sony. Don't worry about raising demand. Supply. Supply, Supply!!!
Features will warrant the purchase. I'll wait and see. I just don't agree to pay to play considering I pay a good amount for highspeed.