Killing Floor is way better.
They really need to step up their zombie mode
Is a FPS with RPG elements.
The quest design is RPG like and so are other things.
But RPGs is when combat is decided by stats.
Fallout is not a RPG FPS.
It might be in first person view, and Bethesda might have shat on the series, but Fallout is a RPG series. Viewpoint doesn't make a difference. VATs is Fallout.
Shooting is Fallout for the new generation
I'd love to hear the reason why oyu thought it was shitty
Don't tell me, you didn't play it and just looked at scores.
+1 to gamers this gen.
I love how everyone who talks bad about AP hasn't even played the game.
Lets see:
The dialogue and choices are wonderful. Way way way better than Mass Effect's retarded conversation choices where the top choice is BE GOOD and the bottom choice is BE EVIL. I love the time limit and choosing your tone to talk. I also like how how you build your character affects your dialogue choices. not many games do that nowadays weirdly enough. Only Obsidian.
New Vegas looks like the closest thing we'll get to a modern Fallout.
Fallout's main focus wasn't the combat. It was the open structure to the quests, the moral ambiquity, the dark humor, the RPG mechanics, the choices, the dialogue and writing etc..
How can you find all of that from a video or a screen?
I hope to God Bethesda gives Fallout 4 to Obsidian and gives them a big budget and lots of time.
What a terrible review
IGN UK and Videogamer still have the best reviews. THey actually talk about every aspect of the game pretty in depth
Actually what was wrong with the last Obsidian games?
Alpha Protocol was great. It is what I wanted ME2 to be. An actual RPG with shooter elements. The whole point of a RPG, is that the combat is decided by stats. You create your character and let his stats fight it out for you. That is what AP did. Your shooting was solely based on how you built our character yourself. I mean the dialogue was great, the conversation system was f'n excellent, the customization was enjoyab...
GO back to that review and tell me one thing where the reviewer actually went in-depth about the game. He didn't even talk about how the factions work which is a huge part of the game. Everything that reviewer said was known from previews. Hell all the images were screens before it was released.
Fallout 3 was good? HA! A big world doesn't make a good RPG.
You need writing, open choices, stats that affect your character and the choices he is able to ...
"Fallout: New Vegas is the game that many wanted Fallout 3 to be. It's harder, more ruthless, better written and more morally ambiguous. It's a game we’ve been wanting to play for more than a decade, a real modern re-imagining of the Fallout series, complete with that deliciously black humour."
This reviewer must be a fallout 1 and 2 fan. Not some stupid fallout 3 fan.
This is what I have been waiting for.
New Vegas here I...
IGN UK:
"Fallout: New Vegas is the game that many wanted Fallout 3 to be. It's harder, more ruthless, better written and more morally ambiguous. It's a game we’ve been wanting to play for more than a decade, a real modern re-imagining of the Fallout series, complete with that deliciously black humour."
I hated FO3 with a passion. THe writing, quests, choices, RPG mechanics and stats and voice acting were freaking terrible beyond belief.
Letros, he blamed WAR failing on the actual directors. He said the marketing was shit too though
My friend hid it in his Dad's closet LOL
They would never look there, and if the dad found it, he would be happy as hell
And if the mom found it, she would probably think it belongs to her husband
They never found it haha
I have ever read. Blaz Blue is a casual fighting game?!
WTF?!
Stay away from this site as much as you can
NOT X-COM!!!
I know must of you guys don't know, but X-com was rated the #1 PC game of all time on IGN.
BUT IT IS A TURN BASED GAME.
Oh god.....a classic franchise....turned into an arcadey shooter?
Make it a PC exclusive, and then make the ports later. Don't try to make it a mainstream game for consoles and change the entire design of the game. Dragon Age was great at doing this though the console ports were terrible.
FEAR 1 on PC was awesome. Amazing. Fantastic. Unbelieveable.
FEAR 2 was garbage.
Monolith is one of the best FPS devs ever:
No One lives forever 1 and 2
Shogo
Blood
AvP 2
FEAR 1
Condemned (not real...
This is what Halo 3 should have been.
Halo3 sucked balls. Halo CE and Halo 2 were awesome. Reach looks awesome
lmao foxgod
WRPGs are in the sh*tter as well. It is just that they finally reached consoles but they are terrible.
Fallout 3 is garbage compared to the other fallouts
Baldurs Gate 2, Planescape Torment, Diablo, Ultima, Wizardy, Neverwinter Nights,Fallout 1 and 2, Icewind Dale etc..
WRPGs suck nowadays compared to back then.
GoW is more action adventure to me. The combat system is extremely simple compared to NG, DMC or Bayonetta, but it has a great story, great puzzles and platforming, whereas the other game are just pure hack and slash. That is why I don'T think they can be compared
Gameplay in Crysis is awesome.
The gameplay in Crysis depends on the player. Everyone who hates on Crysis is too used to the kiddy FPS games where they shove the scripted events down your throat, and say "You have to play the game this way"
Crysis is a FPS where they give you this big open environment, all these tools, and say, Play the game however you want.
So that is bad gameplay? I played the game like Arkham Asylum the first time around. ...
You're buying a COD game for its campaign?
Just rent it then.
Its not worth 6 hours of non stop scripted events with the devs shoving how they want you to play down your throat