“The goat” is averaging 4K players daily…
To put that into perspective, destiny is averaging 30k daily PvP players and that game is full of negativity.
The game died. That is why.
Ie they moved on to another halo instead of doing the live service with infinite,
Yes there is support, but skeleton crew doing it.
That is what the pro is doing.
Pssr is creating a better sharper image from a 1440p base.
Pushing performance and graphic fidelity at the same time.
Pssr is also its own chip set. Separate from the gpu… of which no one else is doing atm.
It would not downgrade the ps5.
The pro enhances ps5 games.
But what is funny, is that this country was hiring off of who a person knew or the color of their skin(mainly white)..
Not “the best” out there.
This is historically proven and can not be argued.
So… what you are saying is that we never did it right… but because hiring standards were raised to be more broad, of which forced companies to to have a far better interviewing process(and still gets ignored by many), you do not like a title being put on it.
The game launched with $20 basic color microtransactions like “red”.
But, most importantly, it launched with Microsoft’s marketing including sponsored streamers “having fun”.
Reason why the game currently averages 3k daily player 5 months after launch
They did not make mass effect or gears 1-3.
They bought exclusive rights for them.
Bungie was making halo. (Bought and paid for but will give Microsoft credit for buying them before the game was released)
Just an fyi.
They can only take credit for forza and fable.
Ie my point, Microsoft has far more missives at bat than they do hits per their entire existence in gaming.
You do realize Microsoft’s money is in most media outlets in areas of the market they want control… let alone one major company?
To spread anything they want.
That they have been sued for using said aspects of their corporation against competitors for dirty tactic marketing/attack pieces disguised as “news”.
Right?
So your “conspiracy theory” really falls flat.
Nearly 200 games supported by psvr2 and counting…
Perhaps you actually pay attention to the product rather than waiting for over fluffed articles on n4g?
I mean, Xbox has not made 1 new AAA game in over a decade….
So, do you ask them to not consider a new console until they support the current one?
I remember when the ps3 launched and they were doing the “you can build a pc cheaper”…
And they literally bolted the cheap parts to a piece of wood.
You can not make this stuff up. 😂😂
Absolutely serious…
To anyone wanting to game on pc, do so…
But do not build a $700 pc to do so.
You will regret throwing the money away immediately nor will you surpass the ps5 let alone the ps5 pro or the ease of use.
...
But they are still partnered with intel… 🤔
Pc side, but it is Microsoft.
@Neo
Many would… yes.
The ps5 is not out of date.
Not in today’s gaming market.
You have the anchor that is the Xbox s to thank for that.
You have the overwhelming majority of the pc community gaming on old rigs pushing 1080p to thank for that.
Gaming is only as good as the games being released.
Since not many companies are doing anything to push gaming other than a pixel count… how is any gaming device “out of date”?
...
Not one smart person would go through a bargain bin parts list to build a pc that is out of date and would need an upgrade that would replace the motherboard and cpu to move forward.
Let alone the generic gpu,
God the desperation from pc/microsoft kids is astonishing.
If platforms want to be popular… then do what is best… make wanted games.
You absolutely will spend a minimum of $1,400 on a pc build.
2k + for solid 14...
Day one, no upgrade other than the most up to date gpu costs you $1,200 with zero game production for said hardware…
And your value is where?
All this talk about PCs when over 50% are still just running 1080p..
Next up, 1440p.
Average fps is 60-120.
There is never a “next gen” on pc..
Just upgrades of which amounts to a very small population.
Yes, one CAN bang their chest, most do not,
😂💪👆
Big difference in waiting a decade for a new AAA ip from Microsoft for it to be redfall vs A game that got hammered non stop from the beginning from Sony.
Huge difference.
Ha! That is how Microsoft even gained any ground.
Viral marketing type adds throwing question marks and negative articles at Sony using their vast “media” partnerships.
That and third party exclusive deals such as mass effect and gears of war etc.
Only depends on what purpose it serves.
Saying that, the “only” official rumor is from Microsoft themselves during the Activision acquisition hearings… of which was speculation.. not a confirmed first hand knowledge.
Microsoft was first to require pay to play online.
473d ago 17 agree30 disagreeView comment
Microsoft was last to do crossplay.
Microsoft was first to force crossplay between their console players and pc players.
Microsoft was first to push a Microsoft account to play on pc.
Microsoft lead the third party contracts of exclusivity.
Sony… want a free account of psn to play their games, like an already existing standard of third party developers like ea, Ubisoft, Microsoft….