When the price is bloated due to gamepass…
Just like crackdown and sea of thieves..
There is no good to come of this.
These are at best cheap or free to play games getting massive price tags to push said system
The masses do not want a high resolution throw back game..
They want new, innovative and fresh off of the roots of the game.
Infinite is THE prime example of that because it is back to the throwback being as basic as can be.
They also want a campaign full of mystery, lore and wonderment.
@sparky
Crackdown is THE best example of the shady tactics from Microsoft.
Yes.. 100% it was a gamepass game with how generic it was.. then Microsoft throws on a AAA price tag to try make gamepass more appealing.
This game is no different. It is not a AAA game.. it is a free to play game with a price tag to make gamepass look more appealing.
Ie there are a lot of gamepass players out there that continuously boost a game becaus...
Actually the argument was pixel counting..
Not many realizing fps is far more important than resolution.
Ie 1080p at 120fps looks far better than 4K at 30 or 60 fps due to the clarity of a game in motion and a far lower latency in controls.
4K 120fps is nowhere near the standard.
1440p mid settings or maxed 1080p I would agree giving the latter is the standard for pc according to steam.
It is not.
Blizzard has been dealing with a group of frustrated gamers who do this in protest for various reasons.
They did this to ea as well.
With some simple searching one can easily find this out.
I would not say fallout, microsoft threw money at this guy to try and make something of infinite… and he did what he could do..probably by contract and said contract ran out so they both said their goodbyes.
But that is just with Microsoft.. they throw money at things and tell them to make games as good as they advertise it to be.
“BlBut it’s there for.. commercial reason”
Gaming has digressed vs the money it pulls in.
Heck… if it were not for Sony actually pushing gaming, we would still be playing Pac-Man but with micro transactions.
Stuffing rereleases with micro transactions for a full price is why gaming is beyond stupid outside of Sony
Cod is part of the argument but not the entirety of concern…
Due to the install base of said game, it serves as the catalyst to
It is also a sales marketing technique knowing exactly what you are saying.
People latch on when drama is involved. No matter the product.
Ie the saying “any press is good press”.
It is all out there to see..
The Japanese cutler spends money on reliable long lasting items.
All stems from Microsoft’s faulty hardware that built distrust with said market.
You are just reading an article payed for by Microsoft’s money doing everything to get the deal done.
Lack of game making and lack of reliability on their hardware is why they do not do well in markets with a culture that looks for the complete opposite of...
Nintendo really does not have competition.
Because Nintendo’s focus is children.
The only competition to Nintendo is parents if a generation ever wants to stop having said portable console from being the baby sitter/distraction.
Yes all ages buy it…
But the core is children.
No.
Sony was innovative.
Developers made games for the more capable hardware design where sega was cheap and Nintendo is and will always be Nintendo.
Microsoft: contracted third party games off of Sonys hardware to make a push with the Xbox 360.. while also releasing known faulty hardware to beat Sony out for that gen and to use said contracts hidden under the “first console” out.
Cod, mass effect, gears of war were all contracts to keep content o...
R and D for what?
Microsoft just throws in out
Your pc has what Microsoft offers no?
1. You obviously did not read the article.
Starfield was an example, along with other titles, where Microsofts sales pitch on buying these larger developers were not the actual reality once in action.
2. Microsoft going after the larger developers does far more damage than just owning the ips.
You have licensing, the patents and a stranglehold on future hardware designs along with dictating the largest game to date.. because sony will have to play along or give Micr...
You obviously do not own a business nor have a clue how to protect one if you had it if you think it is about “hiding” something.
There is a very long list of shady practices from Microsoft when it comes to competitors…
So I would say what does a business have to protect vs what one has to hide.
Nothing is free under a paid subscription,
Sony is alive and well on Sony platforms and content pages.
What the gaming media decides to cover is what you are referring to.
Sony makes noise every single day on their social media and YouTube.
So much so, one would have to wonder why it does not get covered and instead get articles like this.
In fact, Sonys pages looks more like a gaming platform than this tabloid collection on n4g.
If after a decade of nothing and you still throw support to Microsoft… you WILL always tune in,
And you will always comment defending them.