Apparently Phil won't force them to make any games at all, either.
Battle passes, always online, predatory microtransaction practices, focus on cosmetics and in some cases pay to win features over game balance and playable content, low effort and low output... pick from a hat, really.
A stupidly rich man gets richer and avoids serious recompense from very serious offenses under his tenure thanks to other stupidly rich men who also get richer.
Meanwhile, we argue amongst ourselves over trivialities and brand loyalties we foolishly think brings us the future we want... but in reality serves only the bottom line: money and greed.
And so begins the start of the "I told you so" era.
Friday the 13th, the day gaming changed.
A multi faceted statement as like most things, with time beholding the true answer.
Soulcalibur Broken Destiny, huh? Wonder if it'll have trophies.
I think this looks worse personally and it also further confirms that for whatever reason, the PS2 still reigns supreme in Sony's offerings because it had the best slim model and every slim after it didn't look as good as that one. Especially considering the size of the original PS2 to the slim.
But that's also more of my personal opinion.
Picard_facepalm.jpg
please, no....
Urban Chaos is seriously underrated
It works well for smaller titles, like Sea of Stars, Stray, and Fall Guys and Rocket League before it.
I do not think that it is a good idea to release their heavy hitters day and date in the same way Gamepass does it. There should be at least a 6 month buffer before the first party offerings grace the likes of Plus. 6 months based off nothing, just throwing it out there.
There will always be arguments for day and date releases as well as against. Where i...
Because they hate us. Or, there's some kind of unspoken (timed?) exclusivity deal, like with the KOTORs.
Wow, I think this is the first time I have seen you in a Sony related article not saying something laced with sheer Xbox fanboy filtered nonsense. Congratulations, you're making progress in talking like a regular person.
Lightning did this exact thing with me in the Phil Spencer refutes exclusivity claims article. Claimed indifference in the matter while simultaneously being loud and proud with his obvious bias.
Then, when provided with proof/evidence that he himself asked for, just as you guys have with his comment history, he ignored it all and essentially went "lmao no u".
Hopefully less gassy.
We're well past the electric boogaloo stage now.
A step in the right direction, until the replacement is revealed. Even though they, too, will likely suck as well.
Actually, what you did was claim indifference and throw around baseless nonsense without saying much of anything.
Claiming indifference to brand loyalty in an Xbox related article, where you tend to be the most vocal, doesn't explain why Phil is the lord and savior of gaming despite the years of evidence to the contrary.
Both you as well as Zeref had adequate time to explain yourselves, but chose to "lmao no u" me instead of discussing your...
Dodging the opportunity to prove yourself, a staple tactic and strike one.
The recent FTC leaks, which showed previously private and closed door discussions with Phil himself saying things he is now "refuting". Just a little older than that, we have what was revealed in the court proceedings for the Activision acquisition where Phil was again shown to be saying the opposite of his public claims. Especially regarding exclusivity of titles, and Pete Hines comments...
Okay, I referenced actual examples of his contradictory opposite behavior, but I have yet to see any defenders provide proof that is not the case.
Please, by all means. Show me the proof otherwise without involving Playstation or some unfounded accusation about mental health states. The floor is all yours.
25 years in the making
Anything to not produce actual games the same way Nintendo and Sony do, huh?
I just don't understand. I mean, the ultimate goal is the quiet and slow conglomeration of the industry with them on top through buyouts and misdirection, obviously, but taking their statements at face value they look inept beyond reason.
You spend $69 billion dollars for a large scale acquisition, showing everyone in the process that money is not an issue, and then turn aro...