Why do you think that is?
The fact that this had no native PC port to work off of and had to be converted from N64 completely is a fact I feel is both overlooked and misunderstood regarding the effort involved....
But at the same time, Doom 64 follows the same rules and was given a much better treatment than this. Still, better to have it than not at all.
The multi-player of the original Conker's Bad Fur Day is severely underrated and if by some miracle the original returns to switch with multi-player...
However, I used to say the same thing about Perfect Dark getting online multi-player and then it did and it wasn't the dream scenario I expected
This is the DC version of The Avengers, and we saw how that turned out.
This is the best generation ever, with the same games releasing over and over.
Remember when Rocksteady tried to say it wouldn't have any of this when it was leaked prior to the delay, lol
ugggghhhhhhhhh
The most unfortunate thing about this has to be Kevin Conroy's final Batman performance being in this.
Limited Run confirmed a GBA cartridge release of it, but beyond that I'm doubtful it will see any other physical releases
Bill Clinton 2 will take it home
Dripfeed and paywalled content, and canceled story DLC. Almost complete neglect in RDR2's case.
The "years in the making" statement has yet to actually be worth saying. And seems to only be said about mid performing or lesser games.
Which is doubly sad when this sorta implies that John Cena will voice Peacemaker by not including him in the topic.
Actually, as this only existed on N64 with no proper PC port, a whole lot more work went into this than it seems on the surface.
So that gives it a pass to be a lesser entry than those before it?
Something I have never understood is citing games that are barely more than a concept and name, such as Kojima's XBOX game and Project Mara/Dragon, as "gotcha" games when there's literally nothing there to be excited about.
The lipless status of devs is a severely underreported issue in the industry
Blizzard WAS unique many long years ago. They have been considerably less so since the Activision merger (the original, not the the recent MS one) to the point that I wouldn't even use unique or similar derivative in the same sentence as them.
Blizzard's heart and soul have long since died, replaced with hollowed detachment and GaaS schemes. And there's nothing unique about that approach in this industry either, so I have to wonder what he considers "uniqu...
@Obscure
Bro. Xbox doesn't have anything to do with most games put out under its label if we're being frank. After all, buying out and redistributing games is literally the name of their game. Marketing and console bundling on Sony's side aside, MS owns this and you can't try and spin it any other way... especially when you spent so long championing the acquisition and everything else.
It's "their" game, regardless of previo...
So I guess we can expect that Sledgehammer games will be disbanded, courtesy of MS ownership and this failure and low effort. No good press on this at all from what I've seen.
Ten years of hype and expectations.
For me, the first time I'm going into it with mid to low expectations thanks to Rockstar's methods for the last few years. Or rather, Strauss Zelnick forcing his stupidity onto the studio.