You're confused about why an ad for a particular game doesn't show more games?
No you're not.
Ok game, not great. FC3 was better imo.
"People overestimate Star Wars's appeal abroad"
This has to be sarcasm.
"to depend on a multiplat game to sell systems is kinda dumb…"
Spoken like someone who ignores gaming history.
I hope this article opens up the delusional eyes of those hating on MGO3.
http://kotaku.com/one-unexp...
It's all opinions, man.
I love the game, with the exception of the Rush maps and the peer to peer connections.
"Mario and chums aren't photorealistic so why do they need an uberpowerful games machine, their biggest and best properties are like cartoons?"
Because NX needs games other than Nintendo's biggest and best properties. NX needs to be powerful enough that 3rd parties will bother with it when they're deciding which platforms their games will be on.
Wii was a success because of the most casual of casuals, who have since moved on to phone and tablet games if they still game at all. Wii was a fad.
In the case of the WiiU, less powerful hardware is definitely holding it back because 3rd parties aren't bringing their PS4/XB1 games to WiiU.
"I hope they don't stray too far away from traditional console gaming"
Of all the console makers, history has shown that Sony is the least likely to do that.
OT - I'm most likely in on PSVR. I just need a price and a confirmation that No Man's Sky is compatible to seal the deal. Early dev support seem to be good. Hopefully that will continue.
I'm not commenting on his rant because I don't find him to be all that entertaining so I haven't heard it, but calling it like you see it doesn't mean there's no bs involved.
"It's funny how many children here are AMD fanboys simply because their beloved RemasterStation® 4 is made up of crappy AMD junk...
Nvidia is just BETTER. Deal with it, children."
"Too many kiddy Sony Fanboy's downvoting as if their life depends on it. haha that's N4G"
As if only PS4 went with AMD.
Talk about children. smh
What if I thought BF1 was better than BF2?
1 Reason Why No One is Wrong About SWBF :
Opinions.
I enjoyed the beta very much and the revealed content list seems decent to me, therefore I shall buy the game. I'll wait and see on the season pass. If I'm still playing the game a lot and want more, I'll buy it based on my personal opinion of the DLC for Battlefield 3 and 4. If I've gotten tired of the game and don't want more, I'll skip the DLC. It's really very simple.
"2 years in a row, Sony has failed to deliver AAA as well as the Dragon Quests."
2 years in a row, Sony has delivered more games of all kinds.
"This game will satisfy very few."
The biggest selling titles are bought and played by a minority of the potential install base. The average selling titles are bought and played by a much much lower percentage. No game is for everyone, but Sony does the best job of having something ...
I'm hoping the more CoD-ish players will be moving on once the mothership (this year's CoD) calls them home. I enjoy the game despite the irritation of host disconnection, but I wish I could Automatch into a playlist of only big maps. Gameplay on the Rush maps is pretty much always more run and gun. On the big maps, at least sometimes, gameplay can be very tactical and stealthy.
Exactly. One group of people is complaining because the game isn't enough like the old games, and another group is complaining because the game is too much like the old games. Developers just have to ignore all that, do their thing, and see what happens with the finished product. Battlefront 1&2 were both very casual.
It was popular because of the first two games in the series. People were looking forward to it. Witcher 3 had a ton of sales very quickly. Games don't do that because word on the street says they're easy.
"...you could play tactically and methodically , you could play aggressively,you could play stealthy ,it had frantic moments , it had slower moment , it had suspense moments, the level was dynamic proportionate to your real skill level"
I've been in many games like that with MGO3. I find that gameplay on the Rush maps usually fits the "TPS Call Of Duty" description, but on the bigger maps it's often (not always) what you described MGO2 as being lik...
Such a great game. It can't be denied that it had it's problems, but damn I bought it a month after launch and have thoroughly enjoyed it.
Is anyone surprised by this? It seems obvious, but reading comments about Star Wars Battlefront makes me question what sort of grasp on reality some people have.
Doesn't the PS Plus version have what are basically ads for the full game and what you get for upgrading?
I seem to remember articles complaining about that here...