it hasn't even officially been announced.
boring outlook for next year by the looks of things. madworld and no more heroes should be good, but hardly amazing. yawn.
f-zero please. starfox please. waverace please. resident evil 5 please. street fighter 4 please. heck, even goldeneye on the virtual console would do.
if only ps3 were cheaper :oc
bluray is hardly a worthwhile successor to dvd
this game WONT have motion controls like in re4. think about it.. re1 has a fixed camera, and the camera is not always behind your player. so using the wiimote to aim would be odd..
i just bought the same game but for gamecube. i don't see what differences they could incorporate for the 'wii version'.. except what has been mentioned before- widescreen. hardly worth re-releasing for that minor adjustment.
because more people who want the game happen to have a ps3.
i predicted little big planet would flop. even after that publicity stunt recall
i use to buy the magazine
ok, they rarely gave a review below 70% but it is a shame they are going
:o)
sony reduced to cleaning toilets
i dont want luigis mansion. its the last game that comes to mind. now waverace, there's something that gets my attention
ok, this is my last reply, unless i get more bubbles ;o)
to get to the point, YES, the xbox 360s lead over the ps3 WILL continue. maybe sony will be back in the picture if/when they revise the cost, but until then, its down hill.
i foresee a painful 2009 for sony. i am fully expecting the 360 version of resident evil 5 to have the visual edge over the ps3 version, just as all the other multi-platform games.
*i watched the tomb raider comparison and gue...
if the ps3 was such a fantastic value for money, people would snapping them up, the ps3 would be on top with no question. but that is not the case is it.
why are people holding back? even with games like the mighty mgs4? the answer is obvious. even with all the ps3s features, the ps3 is still perceived as being too expensive. the fact of the matter remains, ps3 isn't selling like it's suppose to.
mgs4 is leagues ahead. ps3 needs more software like that, software that makes a clear distinction between what the ps3 is capable of in comparison to the 360
that red logo does look a bit tacky
arguably being the keyword. it doesn't matter about architecture, we all know it is claimed the ps3 is the more powerful machine, but where are we seeing that in the games? what we all are also aware of is the countless situations we have a game on both systems with the 360 version being the technically superior version. if the ps3 is so superior it certainly isn't proving so right now.
and before i get labelled a fan, personally i would choose a ps3 over a 360, if it was cheape...
if sony want to win customers, they need to lower the price. why would somebody buy a ps3 over a 360 when the 360 does the same, if not arguably better at a lower price?
paying the extra for the bluray medium is not good enough. its still not worth the price when you consider the competition.
i always said this year would be the ps3's most important year, the year gta and metal gear solid were released. these games SHOULD have turned the tide for sony, but they haven...
they don't 'finish the job' ... they don't 'deliver the goods' .. if you plan such an ambitious trilogy of games, you make sure you complete the job. just imagine lord of the rings 1 and 2.. but no 3. it would be criminal.
its criminal and a disservice to all segas customers that they didn't finish what they started. i won't forgive them until i see shenmue 3.
i will never respect sega again, unless they produce shenmue 3
why do they drip feed us? i want more n64 games.
i still can't believe rare.. i want goldeneye!