Wouldn't matter if it was garbage. Kinect Star Wars is garbage, but it still saw the light of day.
Yeah, I agree that Milo probably wouldn't have been a great game, but it was the only thing that showed kinect's great potential.
*waits for pedophile jokes* lol
***"It’s just that… what was so hard for some people to imagine is what Milo would look like on the shelves, sitting alongside these murderous shooter games."***
That is a piss poor excuse.
I can't imagine how Just Dance looks on the shelves next to those murderous shooter games. /s
Milo was a great concept and shows the great potential kinect has when it's all said and done. ...
LOL Logic edited his comment after I pointed out his stupidity LMAO!
That's classic Logicwins for ya.
EDIT:
***"Thats where we're different. I would never try to convince anyone that a game is good or "the best ever". What do I have to gain from that?"***
You never tried to convince people that RE5 is good?
***"Why do u all assume that being a PS3 player means that you don't own or have access to a 360?"***
Learn to read...
***"PS3 players are missing out if they do not have a 360"***
@Dante
When did he say he isn't interested in portable gaming?
He's essentially saying why do I need a handheld that offers a PS3 experience when I already have a PS3.
And my reply to that is you could always get a 3DS if console gaming on the go isn't your thing while I however always wanted a console gaming on the go experience.
"Wii Entertsinment System."
The WES, I can dig that too.
You could always get a 3DS if portable console gaming isn't your thing.
You don't "need" a semi-portable one. Personally I've always wanted a portable handheld that has games that closely resemble console experiences and Vita does just that.
Ouch... MrBeatdown killed two birds with one stone... He owned DK... and beat an already "dead" horse in EvilDead lol.
That was PURE entertainment...
You rely on nonprofessionals lol?
Yeah, I know some sites are "bias" but that's why you read multiple reviews. See if the pros and cons are consistent among multiple reviews.
@LuckyStrike
I think you didn't read my comment correctly.
I DO NOT CARE lol.
If Sony charges for PSN, fine I won't pay for it.
Sony looks out for Sony and I'll look out for myself.
Sony needs to make money by charging for PSN? Fine, they should do it. BUT I'm not going to pay for it as I feel I'll be getting ripped off.
"the advert makes it look amazing to the average gamer."
Exactly. I think people forget that one of the highest selling games this gen is Wii fit which really isn't a game in my opinion at least.
Core gamers aren't buying it. It's the casuals that are buying it, thus the Kinect Star Wars sales.
I like how you only care about sales figures.
PSN is a strong selling point for the PS3 and I will not pay for PSN. I hardly play online anyway. The only games I played online religiously was KZ2. KZ3 got screwed over thanks to CoD so now I'm playing single player games. Probably the only thing I'll miss is the demos and the good PSN titles.
If Sony charges for PSN they won't be getting a dime out me. I don't care if they need it or not. Just as they don't care if I like online passes or not.
No?
I mean Halo already has a HUGE fanbase why the need to add CoD elements? Furthermore, I have never seen any fans of any series welcome CoD changes to their games.
***"I and many others welcome this change so that Halo is continually solidifying itself as the definitive console first person shooter."***
Just make a Halo game. There is no need to try and out "CoD" Call of Duty as if it's possible anyway.
GTA V better release this year. I'm tired of all the games I really want coming out a year or more from now.
LOL @ all the peadophile jokes on here.
Milo actually had me at awe with Kinect when I first saw it.
Milo IMO shows the great potential kinect has.
It probably wouldn't have worked well as a game, but it was a great concept IMO. Milo should have at least sparked some great ideas of what developers should/could do with kinect.
Yeah, I wasn't planning to get this game day one, but now I am.
This games does look like it will be that classic PS1 jrpg game.
He says "horn star" lol.
"So yeah, MS had a 1 year head start, Sony and Nintendo have a 1 continent advantage as well"
What?
1 year head start and excluding japan because Microsoft isn't selling well there do not cancel each other out.
By taking japan out, you're taking actual units Sony, Nintendo, and Microsoft has sold in japan.
If you take the 1 year head start in account you aren't excluding any units sold in any region.
Isn't it every year that the only games worth playing are japanese ones according to you?