CRank: 5Score: 109220

So you use a game that was designed as a multiplayer game as a comparison? Sounds like you don’t want any multiplayer games at all, you can’t complain about the possibility of multiplayer taking from away from the single player and then ALSO wanting online games to be single player instead. Seems the only gamers with this mindset are PS gamers as that is all they are being given by Sony. Not everyone wants to play a game for 10-20 hours and move to the next game, and no one wants to play th...

813d ago 7 agree0 disagreeView comment

A multiplayer game’s beta is online, shocker.

813d ago 20 agree0 disagreeView comment

Horizon killed Motorsport.

822d ago 3 agree8 disagreeView comment

The game with 10 years of updates is good (even though everyone complained when it released) but the new game should be cancelled.

831d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Imagine someone paying full price plus more for the upgraded edition, usually $100, and you feel gamepass owners with their $10 sub should receive the same benefits.

843d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Nepotism.

844d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

Because usually management doesn't care until gamers hear about it and raise a stink. Just pray you never end up in a situation where you are getting screwed and never ask for help.

854d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

If intentional that means the game was programmed correctly, if I have the power and it would push more work to the GPU resulting in more stable performance, take it all. People were complaining when the first core did the bulk of the work, dont cry now when they fix it.

859d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

How broken is the game when Sony and MS failed certification? And they still think it may fail and planning on a day 1 patch, somebody was slacking.

860d ago 10 agree1 disagreeView comment

Game has FDR and Genghis Khan, 9.9/10 minimum.

860d ago 1 agree7 disagreeView comment

They would have done this regardless, infinite talent doesn’t exist, but things can always be improved.

860d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

Game could have looked like some holy being crafted it with every feature known to man and modders would have still created mods and your comment would still exist. Wrap it up.

860d ago 5 agree13 disagreeView comment

What?

882d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

Launch soon, gotta get these out before it’s too late.

884d ago 5 agree4 disagreeView comment

Vendors work as they always have, my only issue with them is that they cause my GPU to go to 100%, something up with the 3d models.
Also rerolling more than once gets expensive fast so selling non legendary loot is essential

906d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Please ban videogamer and their AI generated articles

910d ago 32 agree0 disagreeView comment

“Diablo 4 players” and “Starfield fans” just looks AI generated every time I see them.

910d ago 10 agree0 disagreeView comment

That 1 second really got people making theories huh?
I'm pretty sure it was because of the animation as before as soon as the animation opens the scroll the player teleports very quickly, maybe they just wanted the animation to feel more natural and not feel as though the animation was cut off.

911d ago 1 agree8 disagreeView comment

Every game with stats goes through trial and error when the game goes out to millions, people seem to forget Diablo 3 even now still doesn’t that have the amount of endgame content that they think it has. It had 1 dlc and rifts, thats it and people still play it to this day and the seasons where just wipes with a few armor pieces, D4 season 1 is already gonna change more to the game than a D3 season ever did. D3 also launched with no rifts, while D4 launched with Nightmare dungeons.

914d ago 2 agree4 disagreeView comment

Only negative is the nerfs and that is while making monsters 5 level behind and making other builds viable now or did people expect season 1 to make all the changes that Diablo 3 did in its 10+ years of updates?

914d ago 0 agree6 disagreeView comment