CRank: 5Score: 110230

Making generative AI a community effort to avoid some of the criticism and to ease their audience into it, very smart Sony.

16d ago 2 agree4 disagreeView comment

Considering they dont make money off of game sales I doubt they increased the price just to be cartoonishly evil.

17d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

The visuals are completely uninspired, just "realism" but not detailed enough to actually be realistic, boring, no style

35d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Check my comments, over a year ago I was calling out videogamer and N4G on their AI articles pushing slop 24/7

55d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Jagex did add a safe form of gold buying a while ago as you can know buy "bonds" with real money that can be exchanged for 14 days of membership or about 15m gold (current price) in the GE.

85d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Runescape gold cant be bought directly with real money, it is only used to buy items in game, not microtransactions, but there is sort of a time value to it

85d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Sure, I'm sure most “good programmers” write code once and never have to go back to debug and time is never an issue.

89d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

All 10 original fans would be raving

94d ago 7 agree4 disagreeView comment

Yeah, the game should never exist because some idiot decided to pour thousands into an online game. The average player isn’t spending that much on these games, the average probably hasn’t paid a dime.

95d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

It never made it past the alpha test, doubt he’ll get a mention.

141d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Save files not carrying over is such a non issue, i dont see any scenario where someone can who played it so long ago would want to jump back into a old save.

142d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

If 3 games in a 6 year period feels the same then it would be a problem.

143d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Why would they do that when you would buy the cheaper option for them for the same price?

144d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

They’re just yappin to appease investors when they will be delayed a minimum of a year and half easily or will be alot smaller and reusing assets.

144d ago 11 agree2 disagreeView comment

Hopefully that’s what was pitched to MS when funding was agreed on and not just another attempt to get unlimited funding to work on PS games like the scalebound devs.

210d ago 0 agree5 disagreeView comment

Article waits until the day of the new update that speeds up the previous level issues and they have already detailed the next changes

226d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Never a reason to buy a digital movie when you can get deals on physicals and they always come with a digital code. Or if you want to be ethical, buy digital at a heavily discounted price and then download or pirate it and back it up to multiple sources.

279d ago 5 agree3 disagreeView comment

New players are literally the least affected by it, they can’t miss something they never experienced and the original campaign has nothing to do with the last few DLCs. The only ones that have a right to complain are the ones that purchased the game before it went F2P, and i doubt even they, with all the complaining, would ever go back and complete the original campaign over the DLC stories, tho it does sucks that some raids are gone,

282d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

Atleast he didn’t lie about the reason, sucks jobs are lost but some of these games have been announced 5+ years ago and can only muster the occasional “phil has play tested” or tech demos with no release date in sight. Sucks to say but they need tight deadlines and less freedom. Get some creative directors with clear vision and give them the devs to make it happen, don’t give an entire studio the freedom to make a passion project because they will treat it as a hobby.

295d ago 5 agree26 disagreeView comment

MS owns both devs, if they want it, a 3rd party will make it.

372d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment