But much more pertinent to this discussion was the previous PS3 fanboy argument that the 360 couldn't handle native 1080p games - Virtua Tennis being the prime example.
Well, I guess we won't be hearing that argument anymore - just another reason not to bother with the more expensive PS3, whose once mythic abilities now seem to be dwindling more and more as each month goes by.
And CAPS LOCK, why don't you try actually playing the game before you make ridiculous suggestions on how to improve it, or are you being stupid on purpose?
Here are my suggestions: (don't get me wrong, Gears of War is good, but these problems have become an ever increasing annoyance the more I play the game.
1. Get rid of "Spectating" - I generally don't like to sit and watch an entire round from the sidelines just because someone sniped me in the head ...
ya, that might be a smash after all. "Exclusive to PS3" doesn't look good, but I can still hope!
I'm not sure if Capcom's "no comment" counts as smashing this rumor. If anything, that's only going to add more fuel to the fire since Capcom didn't deny it was coming to 360. They just didn't comment.
Nanotechnology is the future, or at least until someone starts producing quantum computers, though that's a bit of a ways off(at least 50 years, though likely much longer than that).
I like how he mentioned the 360 and said it was the console to get if you want next-gen right now.
Are there no longer downloadable songs and leaderboards, or is this just referring to multiplayer?
Yeah, it's really easy to trash talk people electronically, but since this is a video game site, how about you keep your articles relevant and your comments thoughtful. ok?
after your account gets banned, please try to get a life
What happened to worms? and Paperboy? I thought they were both coming out?
How bout someone put an age limit on this site so we don't have to suffer through idiotic, childish posts put up by ten year olds like Hey Zeus!
This is what he says, "the current games that are out there are only using about 20 percent to 25 percent of the [PS3's] bandwidth. Once the publishers' excitement reaches a level of intensity that they start using more of the bandwidth, that will create additional excitement."
What does that mean?
Yeah, this outlines exactly why I'm so happy with my 360.
I can see why PS3 fanboys might have voted lame on this article - If I paid $200 more for a system with less features, games, and equivalent graphics, I'd be pretty mad too!
I feel bad for people who refuse to buy the 360 out of sheer brand loyalty. They're really missing out...
Good God I can't wait for this!
The original was great, and from the looks of this video, they've definetely stepped up the graphics since the demo was released!
now let's just hope they don't fall back on The Rock, or somebody...
The reason you are wrong is because the E3 Killzone trailer was initially presented as "realtime gameplay," while Bungie was upfront about the Halo 3 trailer being CGI the whole time.
Jin's impressed with the trailer, as is most everybody, and if it sways him to get a 360, then why are you raggin on him? Sure he's historically been a ps3 fan, but if he's able to see halo for what it is - an awesome, system selling exclusive - then why are you trying to start something? the ps3 will have cool exclusives, as does the 360, so just leave it alone.
i wish there was a way to preview this stuff...
oh well, since it's a halo 3 theme, they can't really go wrong can they? that's a purchase.
This is good news for Microsoft, but I couldn't care less. I hate turn-based games where you have to stand there and let the computer attack, then you attack, then they attack again, and its all just randomly hitting or missing - I don't see the draw in these kinds of games at all.