You've got me laughing. Your introduction line to 360SUCKZ was classic. Anyway, I totally agree with you. Keep up the good work in pointing out to others that articles usually contain more than one point. N4G is in serious need of intellectual and mature comments. Vulgarities, name calling, fanboyism, personal attacks, narrowminded and stubborn opinions, it's all so obsolete and immature. Have a bubble.
I agree in the sense that your concern on what could be the outcome is relevant. In other words, it could be the case that this happens. However, there could be a number of other outcomes as well. Speculation at this point, although a necessary action, should stay as speculation and not mature into a condemnation of, what I think is, a natural evolution in gaming.
The Wii is highly revolutionary in the sense that it has expanded the gaming demographic, introduced new and intuit...
While I understand your sentiment and concern for the hardcore gamer, I think your argument that Microsoft and Sony will be focusing on casual games and leaving the epic games behind is a misperception on your part.
I want to say more but I'm going to lunch. If I have time I'll edit my response when I get back.
I totally agree. I also think it's important to note that Nintendo's alliances are not taking away from the other console's game development and productivity. This is why the future of gaming has such a great outlook. Each console is receiving a generous amount of attention from multiple developers. I'm very excited and feel very favored to be a gamer in this era.
It flows in the other direction as well. Balance is key to a healthy, secure, and lively society.
As a note, your comment was so foul with poor punctuation and grammer that I am refraining from ever replying to you again until you express yourself in a more coherent way.
Your debate with BenzMoney was a good read. You both presented good points in the argument and also refrained from name calling and hightened fanboyism. Bubbles for you both. Good debate.
Your honesty and attempt at being objective are appreciated.
You sir are someone who understands the dangerous and morally degrading nature of this game yet also understands the primal and grotesque desire of the human animal. Bubble for you.
I see your bubbles have been depleated. Thus I will try to limit my response to only answering any questions within your argument in order to keep your opinion and last remarks on an equal footing.
Indeed, arguments about right and wrong tend to be highly opinionated and can go long into the night and thus I do not wish to delve into such a dispersive debate.
On the matter of discriminatory services (i.e. PA company, catering company, etc.), I do not think my fee...
I think I'd rather buy another Wii. Oh wait, I can't because they're not in stock.
Damn you Apple and your cool products...
I love it. Great idea.
Very well done, "wii on your face". I'm still laughing...and the funniest part is that it's like these words are coming out of Bush's mouth, especially the line, "Labels are for cans, not mans." That is such a Bush sounding line.
Your insight is excellent and your humor is mature and non-volatile. Bubble for you.
I enjoyed reading your response. Your intellectual and analytical prowess is apparent. Bubble for you.
However, your statement, "There are endless examples throughout history of "bad" speech that turned out to be most pivotal in changing society for the better" has me concerned. While I agree with you that there are examples where such a situation has changed the country and society for the better (i.e. the african-american movement, the woman's movement, et...
While I agree with you that R* is pushing the limits with this game I'm not sure that was their sole purpose.
However, I do understand that continually pushing the limits such as this does negatively influence morality and slowly desensitizes an individuals perception of the difference between "right" and "wrong".
This is why there exists a difference between artisitc expression and irresponsible expression. My definition of irresponsible expr...
This game looks super awesome (my inner child has spoken). This game has such an original and unique concept (my inner adult has spoken as well).
I'm all in.
I apologize but what's s/w?
EDIT: While I agree with you that the rating system should be robust and that this is a great example of it working, I don't necessarily think the ESRB is an adequate system. It has a few flaws that need to be addressed.
First of all, I try my best to be objective. I try not to take sides unless the matter insists that I stand up for a good and honorable cause. While your cause may be for the good of morality it is far from being honorable. The way you have argued is immature and verbally violent and for being someone who is against unethical video games such as Manhunt 2 you are delving into and responding with a similar emotional attitude as the very game you are against.
While I agree that M...
Whoa. Dude, seriously, you're going a bit far. This is a gaming website more full of opinions then facts. Syko was just stating his/her opinion and trashing him/her like that is immature and over the top. You may not agree with Syko but that doesn't mean you should attack him/her for it.
Like I said, this is a gaming site, not a political/idealistic soap box for you to stand on and preach to the masses. Your opinion is just as valid as any others but please refrain from persona...
R*'s point about strengthening gaming is a valid one but strengthening gaming also includes a moral responsibility by the industry to develop games that are ethical and do not portray human life as valueless or expendable.
There are other ways to strengthen gaming without resorting to irresponsible and grotesque creations of artisitic expression.
I was smiling through most of the video but when I heard "...the WiiFit looks great with anything from IKEA..." I started laughing like a crazed monkey. That part was hilarious. It's timing was good and it was completely irrelevant to the statement before it about exciting titles, which made the delivery well placed.
Arguing about which game looks better is akin to arguing about the image quality of a picture taken by two different prefessional photographers. It's all a matter of perception and psychological persuasion.
There is no significant notable difference between the two games. They both look outstanding. If any argument should be made it should be about the gameplay since these two games are graphically similar and thus graphically incomparable.