CRank: 5Score: 20510

At the moment, Free-2-Play games are doing extremely well on the market. A successful F2P game would be great for Crytek. The idea that it'd be their downfall is just stupid and tell me that you're not exactly knowledgeable on which markets are doing well right about now.

4742d ago 8 agree5 disagreeView comment

You realize you just wasted all three bubbles on this conversation with your whining, right? Just making sure you know.

4743d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

Then Activision wouldn't make as much money as they would if they released just one game a year. If I'm not mistaken, Black Ops 2 sold less than Modern Warfare 3 did. If that's true, then saturating the market with two games in your franchise in one year would have a rather large effect on the money made in the long run. As a company, Activision has more to gain if they simply do one main title a year.

Unless by two games, you mean a main game and a portable game....

4743d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

I actually wouldn't. Leave Call of Duty 4 where it is. While I never loved the game, it is very much polished and actually not a terrible game. Just leave it like it is.

4743d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

There was Turtles in Time: Reshelled in 2009. SO there's your answer.

4743d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

Out of the 16 trillion mcbillion things that News Corp. owns, the one and only thing you connect it to is FOX? Really? Please, enlighten me as to how much FOX has influenced IGN.

Oh, right... none. So, good job, you brought FOX up for no reason whatsofriggingever. *rolls eyes* It's not like I even like FOX, I'm just tired of hearing about it CONSTANTLY when it has no real bearing at all on most of the discussions that bring it up.

If anything, I'd...

4746d ago 3 agree10 disagreeView comment

I'm sure he does, but I'm also sure he doesn't give half of a quarter of a damn because he'll get paid no matter what he says. He could scream, "MONKEYS WILL REPLACE HUMANS AS GAME DEVELOPERS!" and get paid bunches of money from it.

4747d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yes, because AI TRULY affects the visuals of the game. /s

AI is something developers do. A console's ability to sustain 1080p at 60 frames is mostly the console producer's job. Therefore, your statement is like me saying, "Instead of making smoother paper, I'd like them to make better pencils." Separate jobs, man.

@Yodagamer
I know that. But I have yet to play a game where the AI is so good that it affects the framerate. FEAR 2 h...

4747d ago 2 agree11 disagreeView comment

I wonder if the people saying, "the human eye can't see higher than 15/24/30/45/60/100/120 frames get tired of being stupid?

Eyes can process framerates AT THE LEAST up to 200 frames per second with practice. I'll say this much, have seen the difference between 120 frames and 60 frames and while it isn't quite as obvious as the difference between 30 and 60, it's still quite obvious.

You know, I'd be willing to bet that the people who ...

4747d ago 15 agree2 disagreeView comment

Well, this isn't at all surprising, considering he originally voiced him anyway.

4751d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

@showtimefolks

Long story short: I don't hate consoles. But they do represent some very old hardware and they constantly show the limitations of such old hardware. Don't get me wrong, some of the games on the systems are fantastic, but it's stupid to pretend as though they're just as good as PCs. The thing with PCs is that they are constantly evolving. The thing with consoles is that it's just not their nature to evolve. It's for THAT reason that PCs a...

4752d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

I still can't believe people knocked the 2010 AvP game for not having iron sights. Because, you know, when you're frantically trying to maneuver to keep from getting molested by Xenos and Predators, the best thing to do is pull up your iron sights and slow your character down, right? *rolls eyes*

4755d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

@Y_5150
Are you six years old? Who cares who "won the argument"? It's an argument on the internet. *rolls eyes*

4760d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

"The other guy" had a good record, whereas Obama has nothing but golf and shitty healthcare on his. Just sayin'.

4763d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I wasn't aware that anybody gave a shit about Marcus. :/

4763d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Ugh, you stupid prick, here's an idea: Fix the friggin' debt before spending more money we don't have on a study that will go against your agenda, anyway.

How did this guy get reelected, again?

4765d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Well, this is, um... unique.

4766d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

*sigh* I love it when people try to act as if FOX News is the only station to be rather anti-video games. Now, I don't watch FOX, nor do I want to, but either call out all of the mainstream media (FOX News is part of that too, no matter what they'd like to think) or don't say anything at all, please.

4767d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

And DailyMail. You know, I hate the media here in the US, but UK media is awfully retarded as well. :/

4772d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

You're right, I should send more health potions to those kids to cure what ails them.

I. Am. The. Nicest. Person.

4783d ago 12 agree0 disagreeView comment