MoonConquistador

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 90600

How so?

2766d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

And then it becomes clearer why the rhetoric on here is they only do Halo, Forza and Gears.

It may not be entirely accurate, but more understandable why that rhetoric keeps getting pushed.

The sad thing is, the more projects that fail outside of those 3 franchises is only going to narrow MS focus more so than it already is.

2767d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Lol stop fanning the flames of hype and getting people's expectations aroused

2771d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

The peak of the series was Pacific Rift imo which built upon all that was good about the first game.

I'd love a new one

2775d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The combat mechanics was one of the series strong points (of which there were many btw).

I was personally a bit disappointed with Arkham Knight compared to the other games but even then it was a damn fine series of games.

2782d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

How about just dropping the stinking attitude, it will serve you better in life.

And after bringing up "proving a point", you're the only one who seems to be locked in the battle of who is right and who is wrong.

If your first comment had mentioned it was free for Japanese PS+ then you would have been right and would have saved us all from this pointless back n forth

2794d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

None that are listed in this article anyway.

2800d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Eh?

You couldn't even be bothered reading the few lines on here under the headline?

2802d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment

Still wasting time posting pointless salty comments I see.

2810d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

@TheRealHeisenberg - Yet the 360 was the same price when the PS3 launched, so your argument goes out the window. How come this price factor didn't affect 360 sales in the same way?

2830d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

There was absolutely nothing wrong with the price of the PS3. They were simply competing with a console that was released a year earlier, was easier to programme for and port from PC, had a considerable user base and better established online structure. Can't argue with the pre release arrogance though.

And they still ended up winning the sales battle and produced some gems of games along the way.

I think I got great value for money with my PS3.

2836d ago 15 agree4 disagreeView comment

It's an agree/disagree choice, not a ”im offended” statistic. Why are you so bothered that someone disagreed with your statement?

2836d ago 16 agree5 disagreeView comment

Lol, now that's deep.

2843d ago 6 agree1 disagreeView comment

That's unfortunate. I do wish they'd offer a wider choice though. Maybe a selection of two games from a pot of five each month.

Hope you get something new next month

I already have both too on my PS3. Never quite got into Beyond in the same way as Heavy Rain. But Rayman is always worth another playthrough

2849d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

Ahhhhhhh, some further context from Ultr, let me add some more. Thats a $12 or £12 per year saving being offered through a $40/£40 subscription service meaning that if you wanted both, the Spotify saving gets you 25% saving on your PS+ costs.

But that's not being considered here. Just an entitled bunch complaining over not getting given more

2864d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

I never once threatened you and don't bother assuming I did just because you like to infer things within words which don't exist (and apparently using Caps to shout at people in forums). I could have used the example of slashing the tyres on a car (not your car, a car just so you don't consider this a further threat). But it doesn't change the fact that all I've done is ask you questions about it, state factual information and point out that it's your inferences which ...

2864d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

What point are you trying to make? Sony or the article never suggested it was a huge saving. Only you did so it offered you the chance to use sarcasm. Sarcasm is a wonderful thing when done right but you're making up statements to be sarcastic about, and then need to point out to people that you're being sarcastic. At this point it's lost it's effectiveness.

But seeing as you want to continue flogging this dead horse, what (realistic) saving would you have b...

2864d ago 5 agree9 disagreeView comment

@Septic - No, Kwietstorm is actually correct, it's you who has a skewed (incorrect) take on the words meaning.

Go look up dictionary.com and look at the examples it gives. The two pertinent ones are below and in both examples they use other words to suggest the size of the "cuts"
As a verb
to cut, reduce, or alter:
The editors slashed the story to half its length. (in this example, half is used to describe the size of the cut)

2864d ago 6 agree7 disagreeView comment

You're actually the first person to mention the words huge saving. The article and press release from Sony only mentions that it offers savings. Which it does btw

2864d ago 8 agree6 disagreeView comment
2865d ago Show