Nope, still wouldn't be able to tell much of a difference.
However, the darkness level is no spin. Look at these screenshots. 360 version is full of black crush. And your TV will most likely increase the contrast.
60 lines less? Sorry. Couldn't tell the difference while actually playing the game on a TV.
Only thing noticeable was how dark the 360 version is and how any detail in dark areas is lost.
This shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone anymore looking at 3rd party games.
PS3 version looks great and is FAR from being washed out.
Its dynamic range allows your TV's own contrast, color and brightness preset to not "damage" the overall picture.
Your TV will not display a flat image. So even though a noob's eyes may be tricked, more contrast does not equal better picture.
On the other hand, why is the 360 version so damn dark? It loses detail in dark areas.
And why is the PC version like depth of field...
That's odd.
This is the hottest Sleeping Dogs article in a while. It's like people that didn't care much about the game now suddenly pretend to because it's a graphical comparison. You guys sicken me.
Sleeping Dogs is my favorite open world game this gen so far.
@ape007
What atmosphere? We've seen generic LA and NY settings before.
Sure, GTA has much more content, but the shooting, flow of story, driving and hand-to-hand combat are much better in Sleeping Dogs.
Hopefully Rockstar TAKES NOTE on how that's done ;)
Mystery solved.
How is getting rid of puzzles necessary for better story telling?
I personally think it's bullcrap.
Tomb Raider was mostly about exploration, not combat.
Not gonna lie. Kinda lame.
If they show off fur physics on the PS4's announcement with a close up of Crash's fur and then zoom out at the end to reveal him and his return to PlayStation.... that would be amazing.
So you played Sleeping Dogs AND GTA5? OMG tell me more!
/S
You know, it IS possible for people to honestly like Sleeping Dogs and have more fun with it.
So again, not that it's "cool to hate" on the bigger game. But GTAIV felt clunky in areas where Sleeping Dogs succeeds.
The hand-to-hand combat system is far better in many ways.
Better flow of story, free running, gunplay and driving.
It may not be as big or content packed, but it doesn't need to be. It's really fun and varied. ...
But Sleeping Dogs has an actual hand-to-hand combat system that's far better in many ways.
Better flow of story, gunplay and driving.
It may not be as big as GTAIV, but it doesn't need to. It's really fun.
If it doesn't say anything positive about MS or Nintendo and it has no place on this site.
Because a 10 to 1 negative Sony articles to others ratio is not enough.
/S
I guess it's because it released a year later after the PS3 version.
Also, isn't cross buy a new thing just recently announced?
I didn't see much gameplay aside from some climbing.
I don't remember Dante being a douche and rude. He was born with white/silver hair.
Are we pretending that GBA-GC connectivity was good enough to brag about now and that it's somehow the same exact thing?
lol
Very funny 1up.
There are people who don't care about building one and just want to buy everything in one package. The average consumer won't see building one as practical.
But their laptops are pretty good though.
Best hand-to-hand combat in an open world game of its kind.
Decent third-person shooting mechanic.
The driving is great.
The flow of story is great.