Why would store credit matter when you get you're money back?
$15 credit is the same as $15 cash, their still screwing you over by not going along with the $15 you paid for Assasins Creed III.
Can they really just force refund money without the consent of the person who purchased it?
A last generation console... lol
Really? When I signed up I only got 2, they must have changed it.
How is it you spammers get bubbles so easily... a glitch?
Did this guy just say that Uncharted 3 has better graphics than most PC games?
The delusion is stronger than I thought.
Are you serious? You must be someone who only played The Elder Scrolls from the fifth installment. Nearly EVERY element of the game was stripped of all type of thinking.
The leveling system was simplified to the extreme. Bethesda, despite numerous criticism in Oblivion and Fallout 3 still decided it was a good idea to level the world with the players skills. The game also gets VERY repetitive with all of the fetch quests.
In my opinion, Oblivion with some mod...
I think it was a let down.
They dumbed down the mechanics and stripped all depth that previous Elder Scrolls games had.
It's obvious that no PC gamer has a controller, just like no PC gamer has the physical strength to pick up their computer and move it to their living room to play on their TV like a console.
HA just kidding, Dark Souls PC, despite being a console port, is going to be miles better than the console version.
Did you not understand the fact that this has been in development way before DayZ was even created? So clearly they weren't looking to copy or try to get the audience of DayZ.
I would actually be quite interested to know if the engine used in The WarZ is better than the Arma 2 VBS2 engine.
Do you even have to ask if a PC gamer will buy an overpriced piece of DLC that he has already got for free? On top of that he probably spent around $5 to buy the game
So essentially he is spending less to the buy the game, than Xbox 360 players are spending on a tiny piece of DLC? That just boggles my mind, in a good way though (as in it reinforces the argument that gaming on PC is cheaper.)
Did aliengmr just say there won't be a PC version? Wasn't NVIDIA on board and wasn't it using PhysX? I'm pretty sure that wouldn't demo it's features and amazing graphics on the PC just for the heck of it.
After all, the graphics are really all that's going for the game. Without the next-gen graphics, it's just another 3rd person shooter.
Either way this guy you're replying to seems to have convinced himself that the reason Conner hasn't killed many blue coats, is because Ubisoft doesn't want to offend Americans.
The real reason is that back in the day, the British were the bad guys. Their tyrannical king and queen wanted dominance over a society that wanted freedom. We got it. Accept it.
It's unfortunate though that this game divides people, when it should bring people togethe...
They were probably just red coats disguised as blue coats. Conner is after all wearing blue.
It's not like it matters though, because in the end, the Americans won the war plain and simple. So, Conner will probably take their side.
Very scary! Very terrible too. I just don't get why all third person shooters are copying Uncharted now. It's getting really annoying, every TPS is taking a page from Uncharted's book. So much so that most TPS are now becoming so cinematic that they are on-rails.
So now it's either a generic modern military FPS, or an on-rails cinematic TPS Uncharted clone... gaming industry sucks now, next gen needs to get here faster.
I think you being way too cynical. Sure notch capitalized on a fad, but lets face it, Minecraft was fun when you first played it.
Of course it eventually got old and boring after a while, but which game doesn't? I still remember playing Minecraft for the first time, and I had a blast. I hadn't played anything like it before, and I believe it was innovative.
Well Bethesda is famous for taking over series like Fallout, so if they take STALKER over and make it as popular as their other famous RPG's, it wouldn't surprise me.
Although this does mean that STALKER would be stripped of any kind of depth that it had in the previous games, unfortunately.
Illogical
That's overkill for all of those Kinect games people will be playing on it.
LOL the double standard... if Microsoft did this people would be all over this with the M$ and say that they are money hungry and screwing over their consumers.
Well I'm consistent with DLC, and this is BS. Seriously, what person in their right mind would buy a stupid ticket to gamble on a game with dead multiplayer that isn't even that good?