Agreed, it's really ironic how some people think.
I wonder if Steam will bundle the DLC, or just make it a separate game.
More or less he's parodying the people who are going crazy over this game, when really the gameplay doesn't seem like anything groundbreaking. Being able to see through walls for example is kind of stupid, and killed some of the hype.
No one has even played the game either, except for some people at PAX East. The ones who haven't played it are saying that without a doubt it will be amazing lol...
Sarcasm, please tell me that's sarcasm... otherwise lol
Just saying that the PS4 will "out power" gaming PC's upon release is far fetched, but to say that it will do that for years to come is just hilarious. More so considering the fact that the PS4's CPU would be equivalent to what would be present in a laptop.
Didn't buy Battlefield 3, probably won't be buying Battlefield 4.
How is this news? Who actually thought there would be a game systems released modern day that is solely dedicated for playing games anyways?
Just use the Playstation Vita as an example for why dedicated gaming systems don't do very well i.e. competing systems that can do gaming plus a lot more will beat a dedicated gaming platform.
Amazon's return policy is great, but I didn't know it covered digital goods as well. Their a great company.
Exactly, this is being way over hyped, especially the GDDR5 memory. You can only do so much with it until it gets bottlenecked by the weak CPU and possibly GPU as well.
The CPU of the PS4 seems to be the consoles downfall. Sony (and I'm sure Microsoft won't) step up the consoles to desktop PC level power for the CPU. My best guess to why they couldn't put something more powerful in it would be because there would be too much heat.
2GHz is a fairly low clock speed. My PC from four years ago runs 1000MHz faster. Although it only has 4 cores, and not 8. So the PS4 is going for more cores at lower clock speeds which would only result in more performance if a game is optimized to use all 8 cores.
I haven't been following gaming news lately, so is this suppose to be the PS4 announcement?
Steam definitely has competition now.
At this winter sale Valve wasn't very competitive with their prices, but I've noticed that since then, they have had much better daily deals other than the typical puzzle game.
I don't think I understand Levine.
Is he saying that Bioshock Infinite is technically "claustrophobic" which could mean linear and not open, because game designers did not design the levels properly?
So do knives and other things. Most crimes are committed with handguns anyways, and there's no
legislation right now from anyone to ban handguns, only assault rifles (which aren't really assault rifles, they just call them that).
Seems... average? Definitely nothing special, just another FPS. No longer the pinnacle of graphics either.
I can't imagine how much worse it would be if EA owned Crytek.
You're equating an illegal act with a legal one, so you make no sense.
Obviously when you have a standard definition console that can sell cheaper, have a ton of casual shovelware, plus a few good first party exclusives and massive fan base from previous consoles, yes, you will probably be the winner.
While this could be true, the software attachment rate is what makes the money back. If the PS3's attachment rate is high, it doesn't matter if they sell at a loss.
Not putting it on PC would would pretty bad too because it's modders who fix everything that is broken in Bethesda's games.