It is funny, Bloodborne is the reason why I can't get into Witcher 3.
In Max Payne 3 in the PvP they had slow motion and I believe if you were near the player doing slow mo you would also be in slow mo as well.
I just wish the actual controls and movement wasn't so janky.
It was the controls too right? I remember the tutorial stage, I had to sneak past a guy near a bridge. Every time I try and sneak past, he would spot me. The controls in general just felt PC like which is robotic (on a console). The game is made to be played on PC.
I just bought a Switch and Nintendo Consoles are the only console I don't hook up to the Internet or make an online account for. Nintendo is so far behind in terms of online functionality that when I first turned on the Switch, I thought it was the WiiU. It looked the same and I was like what? Of course, that isn't Nintendo's priority which is fine. The whole console race is just silly. These articles happen because of the amount of clicks they get. There is a reason why all we se...
I get what Masterfox is trying to say, you have MS and Nintendo coming out with the same titles they been doing for years and years. The difference in that is that Zelda and Mario are fantastic games with amazing game play. I just got a switch for Zelda and Mario, I am having a blast with those games. BUT I have nothing else that I want for the Switch. I also don't see anything else that is coming out for the Switch I want.
Then we have Sony, we have a publisher and de...
I am like sweeeeet! RIME! Ughhh, I still need to put time into Zelda, Monster Hunter, DS 3 with friends, D2, and BF 1 just came out with DLC.
The first capture mission the handler tells you, everything you need to capture the monster is in the item box.
Do you realize what he meant by that comment?
Well, can you tell us what you did? Or just playing with someone made it much better? If it is the latter, every game is better when you play with someone you know.
The one thing I said was better in Far Cry 3 was the story and that is what you comment on, on something we agree on. When it comes to weapons, travel and combat, Far Cry 4 had way more for you to do. The only thing that Far Cry 3 did well was the story, and Vass wasn't even the main villain.. He was gone half way through the story. At least give me a real reason on why you think Far Cry 3 was better and don't use something that I already agreed on. Lets be honest, the story in Far Cr...
You have a scene in COD where you are a Russian killing civilians in an airport. I can see a developer putting you in the shoes of a Nazi in a quick scene while you are walking around a concentration camp. I can see something like that but yeah, you are right.
All games are repetitive and dull if you make it that way. I can make Horizon Zero Dawn repetitive and dull but that is on me and not the game. I think Far Cry 4 outshines Far Cry 3 in every single category besides story, which in a Far Cry game isn't a big deal.
It is a button smasher, it is exactly what you think it is. Some people just want to mindlessly kill AI. Nothing wrong with that! Not for everyone though!
The story was the best part of the game! It is just no one wanted the story to end 6 hours into the game. The game ended on a cliffhanger so the people who did enjoy the game's story, got a big middle finger. The cliffhanger left it like it would be an open world stealth game. The lore and setting is what makes it interesting!
It is a simple concept that Sony learned the hard way, we want SP games, but we don't want 60 dollar SP only games with only 5 hours of content.
I always feel like seeing your character is more immersive (for me). I can actually see the character and how the character reacts to the world.
I think you need to talk about this whole situation individually because some developers do put tons of game play content in their games that is WELL WORTH the 60 dollar purchase of the game. But that game also has DLC, when as a developer, do you say, okay this is enough or this isn't enough? MH:W has been getting amazing reviews because of how much content is in the game and how good it is in general.
Also, when it comes to cosmetics, I don't care at all what the...
Over the should is fine but you need to have a dedicated button to switch shoulders. I always think of Socom and Ghost Recon in 2004. Socom used a view that was centered but up a little so you can see everything. That made it so you don't need to use a button to switch shoulders. In Ghost Recon, they use a should view which in my opinion, just makes it more difficult for the user to see. AND you need to use a button to change it wasting a button. Once again, a view that hinders your view ...
This is also old news, I am surprised people haven't heard about this when it is their favorite game.