Buy a PS4 if you want to play it that bad. 🤪
PS4 content playable on PS5 is a big thing for me since I bought a lot of titles digitally. Nothing's been set in stone yet because if I have to re-buy these games, then it's a dealbreaker. But if I can port over my library at no charge and just play them, then it's a safe bet I'm going with Sony next gen as well. If not, then I'm gonna weigh the pros and cons and figure out which way I'm gonna go when the time comes. The rest of it, well, we knew it was gonna be f...
The biggest challenge is this game's essentially being built from the ground up. It's not the tone. 🙄
The last straw? Wasn't that like 2-3 years ago when the whole microtransactions fiasco happened? It was for me. Haven't bought a single EA game since, and won't ever again. I've been burned by them too many times in the past and I won't again. You guys are way too forgiving.
Welcome to last month.
Not interested in this game. I've got more pressing things to do like bleaching my yellow toenails.
That right there is probably the coffin in the physical media sales coffin. The only reason I even bought anything in physical media was because I could trade it in and get cash towards new games. Over the last year or so I haven't bought anything for the PS4 that wasn't digital. I just sucked it up and said if the game sucked then it sucked and I was out the dough. I probably grabbed 3 games that sucked, but the rest were all good. I also sold a lot of my "keeper" game...
Atlas, take my money.
It's a good and bad idea. I can see this working out really well for streamers, casual players and anyone with a good internet connection that isn't bothered by the lack of graphic fidelity. For the most part, this could work and work well. The downside is if you're a pixel pusher, or want to play a game with minimal input lag, the service won't offer you what you're looking for. Of course, people can adapt to input lag, but it's not ideal. Long story short, I thi...
I know it's a remaster, but I just can't take how badly last gen it looks. I checked out the trailer on YouTube to see what I was missing and I'm sure it's a great story, but it's too late in this current console generation to buy games that look like this.
How can it compete, if they put out a console? Simple. They design what they think is what the market wants and then they release it. That's competition.
I gave up on this game when Blizzard started listening to the so called "pro's" whose suggestions utterly ruined what was a great game at launch. I liked it so much originally that I bought it on PS4 and PC, but after all of the changelog nonsense that I won't get into here, I sold my PS4 copy and never looked at the PC version again. This is a case of devs listening to a very vocal minority and ruining it for the silent majority. I'll always have fond memories of the...
Because they're fun, and you don't have to go online. Being offline is a huge part of gaming. If you don't get that, you're not a real gamer.
They're gonna offer nothing. Now pull up your big boy pants and deal.
I really want this one to be good, but I've got a bad feeling about it. Hope to be proven wrong!
Wow. I LOL'd at the thought of those with bandwidth restrictions cringing right now.
It was a fun game. I dug it.
DMC5 is fun, provided you can look past a few of the games graphic shortcomings. Not kidding. Collision detection is very low-res to help framerates, and character shadows on characters are an absolute joke when not in direct sunlight. (Jump on top of Nico's van in the demo stage and look down at shadows under Nero's feet to see exactly how the team pulled off another framerate saving trick. You'll laugh once you realize just what they did!) There's lots more, but serious...
Headline says it all. No reason to read the article. That's the story in a nutshell. Seen it over and over.