I must agree with Chrono. Real PC gamers build their own PC.
I haven't bought a stock PC since my first one back in 2003. I know what I want in my machine and I build with that in mind.
Also, do you know who this man is? If you like any multiplayer FPS game in existence then you need to be praising him, and he is right at least in my case. I buy WAYYYYY more PC games than console games. Its like a 10 to 1 ratio.
As for the people who keep...
So delicious. Them next gen Wii U graphics. Them 120,000 polygons in one character.
What are you talking about? It had a solid game to show off the gamepad. Two in fact. Nintendo Land and ZombiU
The reason there were so few first party titles was because Nintendo was trying to promote third party software, but the third party devs blew it while leaving Nintendo take all the blame.
Rubbish like this draws too much attention. If people would ignore it, and start clicking the positive articles ore often, it would start to go away.
The number or comments and the speed at which this article was approved are the key pointers to why articles like this pop up so much.
People flock to them. Whether you have something good or bad to say about it doesn't matter. You click it, they get paid.
Its started to go down hill for me when they put in walls and made it super juggle heavy.
Though I would say they didn't have fireballs and gun. They did have lasers, unblockable blade and Gon and True Ogre could both breath unblockable fire in Tekken 3 and Tekken Tag. Gon had a fireball so you are incorrect on that front.
@Shin, it certainly wasn't us PC gamers. I hate console nerfed PC games. It was console gamers who did some PC gaming that wanted Dark Souls on PC.
I long for the days of old where we still received "REAL" PC games that weren't held back by game consoles. The days of games like Unreal Tournaments 2004, the original Far Cry, the original F.E.A.R. and Crysis 1. The days where games were optimized to exploit the power of PC hardware instead lowering the perfor...
I'm no Nintendo fan. I'm a 90% PC gamer, though I suppose to people like you, anyone who doesn't speak negatively of Nintendo or support negative views unquestionably is a Nintendo fanboy.
I don't have to be a fan to see how overtly biased the gaming media has been and still is against Nintendo. I'm just calling it how it is. This is pure click bait exploiting a cherry picked subject using selective angles to downplay the success of Mario Kart 8 in the wak...
I agree. This is a desperate article for people who need something negative to say about Nintendo now.
Also, at that other poster...that's how trolls like to do it. They thrive on the hope that you are feeling some sort of resentment or anguish at the news, hence, the presumptuous "why so upset?"
Like I said above, people were going to flock to support this article, since its throwing negativity at something positive about Nintendo.
There have been 2 styles of star fox. The ones that wasn't a straight flying shooter sucked.
That is what star fox is. That is what its known for. That is what people liked.
It would be like God of War without violence or Gran Turismo without licensed cars. It would be missing a large chunk of its identity.
This is a rubbish article looking for a way to kick dirt at all of the good news surrounding Mario Kart 8 right now by exploiting cheap angles.
These kinds of articles show up every time something good happens for Nintendo or the Wii U. Its happened for Wind Waker HD, it happened to Mario 3D World, it happened to Pikmin 3 and so on. Someone will find some way to cast a negative shadow on it usually by using sells comparisons.
This is exactly a negative spin. ...
You have no understanding of business if you believe that.
The price something should be is the lowest reasonable price in which it can still make a profit. The Wii U jut managed to become profitable. It had been selling at loss up until a few months ago.
Why would Nintendo want to go back to losing money on every console sold? How is that the price it should be?
Ugh, I hate titles like this. There is nothing similar about them and they are not targeting the same audience or being made with the same goals.
Its so belittling to call a game answer to "XXXX" companies' "*****". There is no correlation between these games or their goals. Must everything be forced into this console war garbage?
Forced competition sickens me. I see it enough with people trying to force the Wii U gamepad into competit...
EA does not make Battlefield or Dragon Age.
Those are made by DICE and Bioware. EA just publishes them.
People really need to learn the difference between developer and publisher. Developers make games. Publishers fund them and release them.
Resident Evil 4 should not be on that list. It was not in anyway a paid for exclusive, it was an exclusive by choice of the developer alone.
Huh?@"Renting items meant the power of discovery was revitalized by the power of choice."
This makes absolutely no sense. If something is being given to you then there is nothing to discover at all. Did the definition of discovery change overnight while I was asleep or something. When you open a chest that you don't know the contents of, that is discovery. Being shown a list of things that you can pick at leisure negates all discovery. You don't discover it ...
You must not have played melee.
That's pretty much exactly was Marth and Roy was. I say they should have used Lucina(Marth version) in stead of Marth in this game. That would solve this problem easily.
I liked having to go to the "Forest Dungeon" to find the sling shot. It made me have to use more thought and kept the game fresh by constantly having something new to discover as you progressed and having puzzles that required deeper levels of though.
LBW got stale and repetitive fast. You remember the forest dungeon because the effort you have to put into left an impression on you. There was nothing memorable about A Link Between Worlds. It was a game that you run ...
Has everyone forgot the existence of this series of game devices known as the DS?
Nintendo has been dominating in the touchscreen gaming market for almost 10 years.
The gamepad doesn't have a bad touchscreen. You're just bad at using it. It has a high precision touchscreen that was made for pinpoint action as opposed to, you know, a tablet that has a touchscreen that was made to be used with your finger.
I hate using smartphone touchscreens because they lack precision. The screen on the Wii U Gamepad is much more suited for gaming.
I'm sorry, but this is just ridiculous.
What did you upgrade from? A Windows 95 rig usings a Pentium 2 to Windows 98 using a Pentium 3?
Sounds like you don't know anything much about hardware if that happened. In fact everything you are saying sounds uneducated, especially the 15 minute things. You need to send your computer to whoever you got it from, and if you built it yourself then you need to stop.